I think it originally came out in 2013. If I were just introduced to it today, I would think some of the articles were AI written with only slight prompting.
It’s sad that if I write something from scratch, without any writing assistance besides spell checking, mostly for internal company consumption I now review it to see if it smells like AI.
(Just like I would have used a dash above. But I don’t anymore because it has an AI smell and I had to get out of the habit)
I read some articles when openai was first getting popular about them using cheap labor from English-speaking African countries (like Kenya): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34426421
I remember other articles specifically talking about English language features of those regions(like "Okay" instead of "OK") getting into LLMs because of this.
the way they train the models is feeding it lots and lots of literature, and usually high quality.
The way they write by default is thus going to be this weird hybrid of all english styles/dialects from the last ~500 years.
The reason they are heavy with em dashes is that they were immensely popular in literature for a long time but not so much in modern times. So it stands out.
If you tell it to write in a specific way though, it does a good job at it.
Here's detroit english, no messin' around. The reason why AI's love the em dash so much is simple: it’s the most versatile and natural punctuation mark they can use to connect ideas and maintain flow. A large language model's primary goal is to sound human, and when people speak, they often pause, clarify, or insert a quick side-thought the dash captures that conversational stop-and-start rhythm better than a rigid comma or a full-stop period. Plus, in the enormous amount of text the AI studies (its data), the em dash is frequently used by skilled writers as an efficient tool to replace colons, parentheses, or strong commas, so the AI simply picked up that effective writing pattern and runs with it, seeing it as the clearest and most dynamic way to structure complex sentences. That's the real deal.
No, my point has nothing to do with creativity. It's about the fact that their output is taylored to look and sound in a certain way in the later stages of model training, it's not representative of the original text data the base model was trained on.
I refuse to let genAI determine what my writing style should be on principle. I may not be able to do much about the rest of the various degradations genAI brings, but I can at least stand my ground when it comes to my personal expression.
ChatGPT seems to use this most often. Claude uses similar data and training and has similar patterns.
Gemini doesn't yet seem to have a consistent pattern, but it's quite different, and honestly, I find it even more disturbing; Gemini Flash is like chatting with an intelligent 9 year old. Grok feels unnaturally chirpy to me.
"It's not X, it's Y" (or "it's not just X, it's Y") is one of the most common tells, but there are many others. Here's a partial list:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing
It's definitely post-training bias and reinforcement. This rhetorical structure isn't too common IRL. (Or wasn't, anyway, prior to LLMs...)
I recently re-read parts of this book thst I haven’t read in years.
https://github.com/97-things/97-things-every-programmer-shou...
I think it originally came out in 2013. If I were just introduced to it today, I would think some of the articles were AI written with only slight prompting.
It’s sad that if I write something from scratch, without any writing assistance besides spell checking, mostly for internal company consumption I now review it to see if it smells like AI.
(Just like I would have used a dash above. But I don’t anymore because it has an AI smell and I had to get out of the habit)
I read some articles when openai was first getting popular about them using cheap labor from English-speaking African countries (like Kenya): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34426421
I remember other articles specifically talking about English language features of those regions(like "Okay" instead of "OK") getting into LLMs because of this.
the way they train the models is feeding it lots and lots of literature, and usually high quality.
The way they write by default is thus going to be this weird hybrid of all english styles/dialects from the last ~500 years.
The reason they are heavy with em dashes is that they were immensely popular in literature for a long time but not so much in modern times. So it stands out.
If you tell it to write in a specific way though, it does a good job at it.
Here's detroit english, no messin' around. The reason why AI's love the em dash so much is simple: it’s the most versatile and natural punctuation mark they can use to connect ideas and maintain flow. A large language model's primary goal is to sound human, and when people speak, they often pause, clarify, or insert a quick side-thought the dash captures that conversational stop-and-start rhythm better than a rigid comma or a full-stop period. Plus, in the enormous amount of text the AI studies (its data), the em dash is frequently used by skilled writers as an efficient tool to replace colons, parentheses, or strong commas, so the AI simply picked up that effective writing pattern and runs with it, seeing it as the clearest and most dynamic way to structure complex sentences. That's the real deal.
This isn’t accurate - most of the style comes from the fine tuning and reinforcement learning, not from the original training data.
At some point people got this idea that LLMs just repeat or imitate their training data, and that’s completely false for today’s models.
>This isn’t accurate - most of the style comes from the fine tuning and reinforcement learning, not from the original training data.
Fine tuning, reinforcement, etc are all 'training' in my books. Perhaps this is your confusion over 'people got this idea'
> Fine tuning, reinforcement, etc are all 'training' in my books.
They are but they have nothing to do with how frequent anything is in literature which was your main point.
Agreed. The pre-2025 base models don't write like this.
So LLMs have gotten creativity recently?
No, my point has nothing to do with creativity. It's about the fact that their output is taylored to look and sound in a certain way in the later stages of model training, it's not representative of the original text data the base model was trained on.
I used to use the em dash a lot. I refrain from doing it now. I hate that outcome.
I refuse to let genAI determine what my writing style should be on principle. I may not be able to do much about the rest of the various degradations genAI brings, but I can at least stand my ground when it comes to my personal expression.
>I used to use the em dash a lot. I refrain from doing it now. I hate that outcome.
I dont think it ever got taught in my schooling; the semi-colon is what they taught to use.
ChatGPT seems to use this most often. Claude uses similar data and training and has similar patterns.
Gemini doesn't yet seem to have a consistent pattern, but it's quite different, and honestly, I find it even more disturbing; Gemini Flash is like chatting with an intelligent 9 year old. Grok feels unnaturally chirpy to me.
Humans cut the phrase to avoid sounding like AI. AI copied it because humans used it. Style collapsed into feedback loop.
I wonder if it's intentional so that they can identify their model output in the wild using stylometry.