aluminum is not safe, and it's inclusion as an "adjuvicant" is entirely, about money
the only reason that aluminum "works" is that it triggers a massive immune response to it's sudden, and unwelcome presence in the human body, where, statisicaly, you will survive, but it is still very much a roll of the dice.
I will definitely trust a random, prima facie absurd, claim from an anonymous someone on the internet (with bad grammar, misspellings, and lack of capitalization) over peer-reviewed scientific studies. Yep.
As I understand it, aluminum salts have been used for decades globally, administered to over 1 billion people in vaccines with no statistically significant indication that it is unsafe. For example, in a study[1] in Denmark including more than 1 million children, there were no statistically significant increases in risk for any autoimmune and developmental outcomes they studied.
If you're going to assert a lack of safety in something that has been used so much for so long, it would be helpful to cite methodologically sound studies and non-anecdotal data to back up that assertion.
aluminum is not safe, and it's inclusion as an "adjuvicant" is entirely, about money the only reason that aluminum "works" is that it triggers a massive immune response to it's sudden, and unwelcome presence in the human body, where, statisicaly, you will survive, but it is still very much a roll of the dice.
I will definitely trust a random, prima facie absurd, claim from an anonymous someone on the internet (with bad grammar, misspellings, and lack of capitalization) over peer-reviewed scientific studies. Yep.
> aluminum is not safe
[Citation needed]
As I understand it, aluminum salts have been used for decades globally, administered to over 1 billion people in vaccines with no statistically significant indication that it is unsafe. For example, in a study[1] in Denmark including more than 1 million children, there were no statistically significant increases in risk for any autoimmune and developmental outcomes they studied.
If you're going to assert a lack of safety in something that has been used so much for so long, it would be helpful to cite methodologically sound studies and non-anecdotal data to back up that assertion.
[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40658954/