In my experience, legal and tax complexities are more than sufficient to restrict the countries that we have remote workers living in.
We work globally so practical things like timezones aren't really a factor; we have plenty of experience working around them. That even goes as far as things like personal security in locations that are particularly dangerous. In my line of work that usually means risk of kidnapping. It will be a factor we take into account but wouldn't usually be decisive.
Having said that, I have been involved in setting up multiple offices in new locations. But only where we're expecting to have a significant presence over the long term. Essentially, where we can amortise the costs of legal and tax expertise.
Source: reasonably senior executive at a very large, global financial organisation.
If you want to work remote, then easiest approach is to establish yourself as a company / self employed and do effectively freelancing. Entering into employment contract with somebody outside your legal presence is a problem for lawyers. Paying an invoice to a company somewhere in Eastern Europe is not a big deal.
There are duck quacking principles. Just because a contract says "Supplier: XYZ Ltd" doesn't mean it isnt employment from a tax and employment law point of view.
In theory yeah, practically whole outsourcing business stands on the fact that nobody will poke too much into "business is paying periodically this one-guy company in India".
legal entities cost millions to set up for big companies
many companies are afraid of the employment laws they don't fully understand
timezones/cultural differences
There are still contracts for working remotely at companies like this, but you've gotta be known for solving painful problems that they can't fix themselves
In my experience, legal and tax complexities are more than sufficient to restrict the countries that we have remote workers living in.
We work globally so practical things like timezones aren't really a factor; we have plenty of experience working around them. That even goes as far as things like personal security in locations that are particularly dangerous. In my line of work that usually means risk of kidnapping. It will be a factor we take into account but wouldn't usually be decisive.
Having said that, I have been involved in setting up multiple offices in new locations. But only where we're expecting to have a significant presence over the long term. Essentially, where we can amortise the costs of legal and tax expertise.
Source: reasonably senior executive at a very large, global financial organisation.
Are you hiring?
If you want to work remote, then easiest approach is to establish yourself as a company / self employed and do effectively freelancing. Entering into employment contract with somebody outside your legal presence is a problem for lawyers. Paying an invoice to a company somewhere in Eastern Europe is not a big deal.
There are duck quacking principles. Just because a contract says "Supplier: XYZ Ltd" doesn't mean it isnt employment from a tax and employment law point of view.
In theory yeah, practically whole outsourcing business stands on the fact that nobody will poke too much into "business is paying periodically this one-guy company in India".
legal entities cost millions to set up for big companies
many companies are afraid of the employment laws they don't fully understand
timezones/cultural differences
There are still contracts for working remotely at companies like this, but you've gotta be known for solving painful problems that they can't fix themselves
One thing I learnt eventually is: it's not a good idea do business with any party that would be impractical to sue if need be.
Synchronizing meeting schedules is one main reason.
Meeting times and already existing taxation systems set up in those countries.
yes, it's all of the above.
Better not upvote you then :)