Author here. Not anti-wearables. The post is closer to a frame for using one well than an argument against wearing one: the watch's testimony is real, the verdict is yours, and most of the failure modes I see are people letting the testimony pretend to be the verdict. Most curious to hear from readers who feel a wearable has actually corrected something their body had stopped reporting; that's the case the post wrestles with least confidently.
Author here. Not anti-wearables. The post is closer to a frame for using one well than an argument against wearing one: the watch's testimony is real, the verdict is yours, and most of the failure modes I see are people letting the testimony pretend to be the verdict. Most curious to hear from readers who feel a wearable has actually corrected something their body had stopped reporting; that's the case the post wrestles with least confidently.