I wish that people would not use AI to generate copy or websites, at this point it induces an almost instinctual negative reaction: 'What Modelloop does -- in three movements' is a classical example of AI lingo. I don't have proof but I feel that the most recent models have gotten worse. The rhetorical devices they use are tiring and off-putting at this point.
Mostly unrelated, but what is going on with the "I specifically approve section ... of the terms and conditions" when you sign in without an account. Is this a new requirement somewhere?
Other than that, seems interesting! Simulink could always do with a competitor, although I'm always saying Simulink needs a text-based interface. Same signal flow programming model that supports scopes and continues time integrators, just with text instead of drag-and-drop.
Hey, Embedded Dev here, i will suggest my team to use and i will test it out as well. but honestly i feel more than embedded developers it will be more useful for solution engineers who work with direct customers. Regardless i will my feedback here after testing it.
Please don't change my mouse cursor. It is unexpected; disorienting; it is unnecessary; there were probably more pressing areas to focus attention; if the project is successful at some point, you will wind up having to work on it again; and until then you will spend mental energy responding to or ignoring complaints about it.
Hi brudgers, thanks for the feedback. I had the same concern, so I will change it in the next few hours. Do you want to share other feedbacks about the product itself?
I wish that people would not use AI to generate copy or websites, at this point it induces an almost instinctual negative reaction: 'What Modelloop does -- in three movements' is a classical example of AI lingo. I don't have proof but I feel that the most recent models have gotten worse. The rhetorical devices they use are tiring and off-putting at this point.
HN found the cursor bug faster than any QA team could. Cool idea though, who is the main user: students, makers, or embedded engineers?
Mostly unrelated, but what is going on with the "I specifically approve section ... of the terms and conditions" when you sign in without an account. Is this a new requirement somewhere?
Other than that, seems interesting! Simulink could always do with a competitor, although I'm always saying Simulink needs a text-based interface. Same signal flow programming model that supports scopes and continues time integrators, just with text instead of drag-and-drop.
Someone already mentioned the mouse cursor... is it supposed to be solved? Now I see... none, which is kind of pointless on desktop.
Hey, Embedded Dev here, i will suggest my team to use and i will test it out as well. but honestly i feel more than embedded developers it will be more useful for solution engineers who work with direct customers. Regardless i will my feedback here after testing it.
Does it support Imperial units?
I've seen slighly similar presentations in LabView and/or Matlab. How does your project compare to them?
Please don't change my mouse cursor. It is unexpected; disorienting; it is unnecessary; there were probably more pressing areas to focus attention; if the project is successful at some point, you will wind up having to work on it again; and until then you will spend mental energy responding to or ignoring complaints about it.
Good luck.
Hi brudgers, thanks for the feedback. I had the same concern, so I will change it in the next few hours. Do you want to share other feedbacks about the product itself?
stop fucking with my scroll and mouse pointer (overriding mouse sensitivity is crazy)