Fortunately the site is right next to the title, and so HN regulars can see it's a Simon Willison post about it. And like many expect, it isn't merely reporting, but offers interesting thoughts on it, including some not in the HN discussion you mentioned.
> Fortunately the site is right next to the title, and so HN regulars can see it's a Simon Willison post about it.
With exactly the same title? Regardless it isn't the original post and that is what most are here for. I am just saving them a click to go to the source article.
> And like many expect, it isn't merely reporting, but offers interesting thoughts on it, including some not in the HN discussion you mentioned.
It is reporting on the blog itself. In fact, the whole post could have been a comment under the actual post in [0] where the comments shows more than one perspective. That goes both ways.
But it is far more better to have lots of other commenters telling us what they think with the full context of the article, rather than just one perspective with tiny excerpts from the source.
Discussion on source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837877
This is dupe of an ongoing discussion in [0].
The actual source post of this article can be read here: [1]
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837877
[1] https://bun.com/blog/bun-in-rust
That isn't what dupe means here.
It isn't the original source and the title is exactly the same as the original post as per the guidelines. [0]
"Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter."
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Fortunately the site is right next to the title, and so HN regulars can see it's a Simon Willison post about it. And like many expect, it isn't merely reporting, but offers interesting thoughts on it, including some not in the HN discussion you mentioned.
> Fortunately the site is right next to the title, and so HN regulars can see it's a Simon Willison post about it.
With exactly the same title? Regardless it isn't the original post and that is what most are here for. I am just saving them a click to go to the source article.
> And like many expect, it isn't merely reporting, but offers interesting thoughts on it, including some not in the HN discussion you mentioned.
It is reporting on the blog itself. In fact, the whole post could have been a comment under the actual post in [0] where the comments shows more than one perspective. That goes both ways.
But it is far more better to have lots of other commenters telling us what they think with the full context of the article, rather than just one perspective with tiny excerpts from the source.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837877
Is anyone working on rewriting Rust in Bun?