Easier than reading the source myself, but I don't think the site makes a good case for why I SHOULD apply CC's patterns to my own systems, besides it being the most used harness. It's clearly useful software, but that doesn't _necessarily_ translate to something to learn from.
Easier than reading the source myself, but I don't think the site makes a good case for why I SHOULD apply CC's patterns to my own systems, besides it being the most used harness. It's clearly useful software, but that doesn't _necessarily_ translate to something to learn from.
It is apparently a vibecoded mess: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772282
Pure slop, completely unadulterated from what I can tell.
Kudos for at least admitting upfront that it’s pure slop, I guess.
[dead]
Auditing the actual code would build far more trust than any third-party certification. That's the real win here for security-conscious deployments.