> We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime. Deno will remain open source, and we welcome others who want to continue its development.
So unless someone else picks up development, Deno will no longer be supported.
This is a wild detail to just bury at the bottom. So many companies went all-in on Deno in recent years. Some even did major migrations off Node.js. Sucks for them I guess, but that's always the risk in chasing the shiny new thing over sticking to the old and dependable.
Exactly that. I am really surprised by the amount of comments with this huge sentiment and doom mongering. These days it’s really not a big deal. Million lines of deno based ts is not a problem because pretty much any functionality provided to deno is available for node as well. You probably can migrate off much of the external deps without much hassle. You can even migrate to different language ecosystem altogether like others have mentioned in comments.
> ...pretty much any functionality provided to deno is available for node as well.
Unfortunately Node still can't do something like this out of the box (AFAIK at least):
import { Bla } from "npm:bla@^5";
Such direct imports are basically the killer feature of Deno for simple standalone tooling scripts in otherwise non-JS/TS projects, e.g. it made TS a perfect replacement for Python even without a "batteries included" standard library.
Deno also has a builtin TS type checker, linter, formatter, test runner with coverage support, package manager, language server etc etc... In node these are all separate (and often 3rd-party) tools.
I don't want the install step. That's redundant. Just a .ts script I can run via `deno run bla.ts` and which directly pulls in any dependency it needs from the web.
I understand the point of this, just saying an existing codebase importing things this way doesn't seem all that hard to convert if you need to get off Deno.
Only when you have no control over the version you're pulling in, but the semver resolution works as expected. Also we're talking about small standalone 'shell scripts', not 'real projects'. Think 'bla.sh', just with a .ts extension. Deno is really great for such small helper scripts.
It's one of those things that the technical aspect is simple but the paperwork dehumanizes me. Just a couple more bullshit engineering design documents to generate
Node only has experimental permissions support (making it not as good for local scripts), and no WebGPU (though you can import dawn wrapper). Deno desktop is way ahead of anything available for Node.
Yes they are. If opensource product A does not have better features than competing opensource product B, uses move to the better product A and pretty soon, almost nobody will use product B. Take BSD vs Linux for example. We get "we've migrated to BSD" or "we've migrated to Linux" posts all the time and arguments for one or the other. Is there a winner and loser? Yes. Larger communities, more developers, more corporate sponsors, more contributions, etc. Certainly looks like competition to me.
Well, the license Deno is distributed under explicitly warns you (sorry for all caps):
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
However I now work with software that requires PQC resistance and node's native ML-KEM and ML-DSA abilities made me switch back. Also I'm not particularly an Anthropic fan so that was also a separate nail in its coffin for me.
Now I'm fascinated why you've chosen the node/npm ecosystem for something with such high security requirements. Are you doing anything special to deeply pin dependencies, etc.?
Finding the right balance of "being responsive to bugfixes, some of which may patch disclosed zero-days" and "not allowing a compromised package to be installed" is tough, these days.
npm has supported min-release-age since Februrary, both that and pinned dependencies are stuff I think everyone should be doing. wrt sensitive environments, I can't say too much about our internal processes but we have an audited private registry among other things. for containers, Iron Bank provides a free and publicly accessible baseline https://p1.dso.mil/iron-bank to build on top of.
As a non-js developer, Bun compiles my ts code to local executables nicely. Allows me to experiment with the new diversity of ts frameworks and distribute the binaries (hobby scope).
I'm using Vercel PKG to compile my JS code to executables "nicely".
But PKG is not supported by anyone any more (?) and it has an upper limit on the version of Node.js base-image it will support.
If Bun supports compiling executables nicely I hope that feature somehow stays alive and is migrated to other runtimes. Or maybe it can become a standalone tool for exe-compiling?
I mean I used to do a lot of things I'm glad I don't have to anymore. I'm not a big fan of doing repetitive work just because I understand how to.
Node at least picked up --run, TS stripping support, .env loading, watch mode, and sqlite (plus some other things I'm probably forgetting) since Deno started so at least theres that.
I also don't like repetitive work, but I think it can be beneficial to understand how the tools you use work, and bun/Deno seem to abstract much of it away.
Random example: I've worked with many frontend developers who seemed to believe listing dependencies in package.json in devDependencies instead of 'dependencies' controls what ends up in the production bundle.
I'm under the impression few understand that this is only a cosmetic distinction unless you use the package manager's --omit=dev or --production flags during install.
What is included in the production bundle is of course determined by the bundler's dependency-graph reachability from the entry point.
For people who never configured these tools themselves, it's probably difficult to understand how the modern web stack works.
However, nowadays you can probably have AI explain it to you well enough while it fixes the issues.
> I've worked with many frontend developers who seemed to believe listing dependencies in package.json in devDependencies instead of 'dependencies' controls what ends up in the production bundle.
If so many believe that it’s how it should work, maybe it just should work that way. Principle of least surprise and all that.
Like say you installed only the production dependencies, then you'd be missing the build tools, bundler, etc.
One idea would be to use hooks of your bundler to enforce that each module resolved during the production build is declared in the regular dependencies.
It's not built in to ESLint, but it's fairly widely used in my experience and helps ensure that you've got a sensible split between production and non-production.
NX Monorepos work that way. Broadly speaking (and with many exceptions) all packages end up in the root. It “builds” release distributions with the correct package.json files and transpiled js.
It helps keep all your related packages on the same dependencies. It’s hell for react native sometimes though.
With nx you define the dependencies between your tasks, so that the packages build in the right order and with caching.
I do not think it changes anything about how packages are installed by the package manager or bundled by the bundler.
You can declare build tools in either the root package.json or packages/a/package.json, and I don't think anything prevents you from bundling something declared in devDependencies.
On second thought, I see now that you probably mean it helps keep shared dependencies at the same version when you declare them in the root package.json.
That's a feature of npm/pnpm/yarn workspaces though, not nx itself. And it only works with bundled dependencies, since they would be undeclared in the package itself and thus couldn't be installed externally. If you need that, I think pnpm catalogs would be the right tool.
One should understand how their tools work but there's no such thing as doing that without understanding things across the abstractions involved and at least a good portion of what happens under them, Deno or not.
It works the same way you use a bundler instead of assembling your own and so on and so forth down the tree. The farther down the tree, the less focus you should give your understanding to, but that's not an excuse for giving no understanding below the first layer.
Bun always seemed weird because they decided to build it with Zig. I want Zig to succeed, but it's not stable yet.
It reminds me of game engines. If you want to make a game engine, there's nothing wrong with that, but you should acknowledge that you're building a game engine, not a game--or rather, if your goal is to make a game, starting by making a game engine probably isn't optimal.
It's the same for Bun. It's clear that they wanted to build a JavaScript runtime, and also they wanted to use Zig. They are doing both of these things, but when push comes to shove, their desire to use Zig was more important than their desire to make a JavaScript runtime, I believe.
I lead a project built on Deno; it was not my call, just to be clear. Deno turned out unfortunately to be a miss and we had seen the writing on the wall. FWIW, we're moving to a much bigger Rust core program with node for JS user extensibility. (In other words, I'm not willing to risk using the deno_core crates.)
The one silver lining here is that Deno had already increased their node/npm compatibility. Migrating off of the jsr ecosystem and back to npm is going to be less painful than one might imagine. I expect present LLMs to be sufficiently good at the task, for example.
A few things off the top of my head (we've been on deno since 2022)
- They originally bet on being a TypeScript dialect that didn't quite match the expectations of node in a few small places that ended up mattering hugely.
- One of the original value propositions was "deno compile" and "deno bundle", and those never actually worked well enough to be robust for our real-world use cases (early on they didn't support TLA, then dynamic imports didn't work, then they had issues with ARM compilation)
- Then they simultaneously tried to support node syntax out of the box with npm import specifiers _and_ create a new javascript registry (jsr.io)
- At the point where we expected them to actually make their base-level ecosystem robust, they pivoted to edge compute, and then the writing was on the wall
Do these runtimes have some value today? Sort of. But the cost of reimplementing them goes down, down, down. I made two bespoke JS runtimes within a year. Next year it will be even easier.
Deno/Bun see the picture better than I do, and they decided it was the right time for an acquihire.
At least open source gives them an opportunity for the community to find a way to support it going forward. But I suppose that's just table stakes these days.
I was really surprised that cloudflare was acquiring deno to be honest, I have written about this here before, Deno was always sort of dead to me due to how little they cared for compat of all kinds (nodejs, CJS, backwards). It was refreshing to see bun care a lot about it (well, now its on a different path in other ways).
Then I read that paragraph, and it made more sense that they're acquihiring + killing.
And seems they want to compete with Anthropic, by having expertise on JS runtimes? A big feature I think is the ability to produce an executable application and have your AI agent-tools work well with that.
>So many companies went all-in on Deno in recent years.
Companies went all-in in a barely established niche player with 1/100 the traction, instead of sticking with Node, and even better an LTS Node, and are now surprised?
For me Deno has a really nice security posture, the permissions model is just something I haven't seen in from other runtimes (JS or otherwise). There were other nice features (native typescript support, compilation to a standalone binary), but the permissions model was just unique.
Like a decade ago I got into a huge fight with a Staff Eng at our company over Dart. I had just been put in charge of the company's architecture and one of the first things I did was migrate everything to TypeScript (which was relatively new at the time). He was so angry I didn't pick Dart. Good choice by me in retrospect (though picking Angular 2 over React not so much).
I don't know enough about Angular 2 to know exactly how much of a bad choice that was, but my experience in React has always been "they should have used something else". I vaguely recall our lead backend being unhappy with his decision to do the original admin panel in Angular, but I chalked that up to him not being a frontender.
For context: I begrudgingly adopted Vue a while ago after finding React to be too unwieldy, and part of that opinion is definitely related to a poorly written Redux implementation.
It sounds like you're coming at this from a perspective of popularity and thus access to engineering candidates with expertise in it which is fair, but speaking as someone who also went with Angular 2 over React during those times, I'm still using Angular and I'm very happy with it from a technical perspective. Yes, it does mean there are less options for hiring, but it has been a positive experience for my team and for me in my own projects to stick with it.
My dart story. While in college for computer programming our professor telling us if we wanted to get ahead of the curve start learning dart. It was the future
It's really a bummer that Dart gets a bad rap, because of its early versions. The recent versions of Dart are a lovely language to work with. Pub is the only package manager I've used that approaches Cargo in quality.
All TypeScript competitors got out-engineered by Microsoft. It’s a triumph of experience over new ideas.
How well designed the initial versions of TypeScript were can be seen by how smoothly later versions were able to build on them, and even after so many major improvements the language has barely a wart (enums probably being the only one).
namespaces are the other one, and that's a fun legacy because Typescript had to implement a half dozen module systems in the early days: no modules (jQuery-era globalThis pollution), AMD, UMD, CommonJS, SystemJS, Typescript's own which was proto-ESM inspired but not ESM, then Typescript's realignment with ESM.
Something of its own sign of Microsoft out-engineering some of the hiccups of the ecosystem as a whole. (I started using Typescript < 1 simply because it was the safest and easiest way to write AMD modules also with an eye to UMD or SystemJS output with just a compiler flag change if you needed to ship something compatible outside the house.)
> He was so angry I didn't pick Dart. Good choice by me in retrospect (though picking Angular 2 over React not so much).
1/3rd of apps on the iOS and Android app store use flutter and that percentage is growing over time. Whereas people are moving away from JS/TS frameworks like React Native.
I wonder if TS could evolve into a compiler whose output would use either Deno, Bun or Node? When the exe is compiled it no longer matters what libraries it uses underneath?
But it is Open Source, so if said companies like Deno enough, all they have to do is pay for its continued maintenance and development. This is one major thing that sets Open Source apart from proprietary software.
Given these two are both comparable to the Cloudflare developer stack that I often think of as alternatives, this makes the decision to let Deno die feel at least a bit more calculated.
I do wonder if it's been shopped around to any of these large-scale users as potential maintainers. Seems in the overall wheelhouse for Supabase in particular.
> Companies went all-in in a barely established niche player with 1/100 the traction, instead of sticking with Node, and even better an LTS Node, and are now surprised?
Wait till you hear about this thing called Bun.
Though with a tiny core team and almost carte blanche AI credits, they are a lot leaner.
Indeed, seems like it should be pretty straightforward.
I understand why the venture-backed entity couldn't do this, but given the reactions here, could a new maintainer not take over and simply charge for support and future enterprise features like the Sidekiq guy?
The yt-dlp project uses Deno as its default and preferred JavaScript runtime when downloading YouTube videos (this replaced their own handwritten JS interpreter). Fortunately yt-dlp also has support for Node and QuickJS as well as deprecated support for Bun, but I don’t think any of those were preferred by the project for various reasons such as portability, security and I think also speed.
As I recall, they picked Deno over Bun during the whole vibecoding rewrite fiasco from six months ago, and there wasn't a ton of explanation given beyond the general vibe of "ai bad". They might reevaluate that in light of things being generally fine and losing their precious handcoded runtime choice.
> there wasn't a ton of explanation given beyond the general vibe of "ai bad"
I'm very bullish on AI, but vibe-porting the piece of software you're the main maintainer over a few weeks without letting anyone in the community know and pushing that as a fait accompli to both your userbase and your open source community is definitely the kind of behavior that makes you not trustworthy enough to depend on.
as a counterpoint, your fears are hypothetical so far - nobody on earth cares as much about bun as the bun team and if it was good enough for them it is probably good enough for 99% of users
i think someone who has built their infra on top of bun and have bills to pay care much more about bun stability than the team who get paid by Anthropic to vibecode an entire rewrite to another lang
The vibecoded rewrite led to the deprecation of support for Bun but I believe Deno was already the default. Also Bun had the note “No permission restrictions available. Scripts have full file system and network access.”
If I remember correctly, Deno was always priority number 1 due to having a permissions system. Bun's removal due to the rewrite had people complaining using Deno as the focus as Deno's development shifted towards being LLM heavy. Node now supporting permissions would likely be the priority now.
There was a ton of criticism beyond "ai bad". A complete rewrite, in a different language, is a brand new project. It doesn't have any where near the hardening as the previous version thousands of deployments. If they had done that exact same thing but without AI people still would have been upset.
> As I recall, they picked Deno over Bun during the whole vibecoding rewrite fiasco from six months ago, and there wasn't a ton of explanation given beyond the general vibe of "ai bad".
Your comment is baffling. Either you lost track of the story or you've opted to post a very simplistic take on the whole Bun fiasco. Bun's ill-advised rewrite had zero technical grounds and the radical drop in release cadence in spite of all the AI backing suggests the project's foundation lays on shaky ground.
I don't think that's a good interpretation of what happened.
Bun's release cadence dropped because they had just ported to a new language and they weren't about to release that to their community without letting it settle in for a couple of months first - which they did, by running it in Claude Code on millions of computers.
‘Acquires’ is an interesting word, given they’re hiring people and sunsetting the product. They didn’t buy Deno, they hired the team that built it and that forces them to abandon the project.
Language really means nothing these days…
(Yeah I’m salty, I got all in on Deno a year ago.)
It’s immutable npm, you can’t unpublish I believe but yeah it’s trick of allowing one to publish typescript packages rather than compiled js only applies to deno.
I think it’s covered appropriately for the audiences. The two posts are for different audiences and purposes. The Deno post by Ryan is for the Deno audience, which is mention at the top of his writing on the Cloudflare post that is for a broader audience of what this means for the Cloudflare audience:
“For more on what's happening to the Deno runtime and our various efforts, see my post on the Deno blog.”
FWIW both Ryan and Kenton are very transparent in person, in public, and online over their professional careers. They will and do openly change their minds based on new information and opportunities as time goes along. Both are now founders of open source projects acquired by Cloudflare for the technical architecture talents seeing a future that they would like to build.
> why? unless cloudflare's CEO is a friend of cloudflare people, so just want to financially them bail out...why acquire and kill?
Aquihiring is a time-tested strategy to build out a team. The Deno folks likely have a bunch of experience that Cloudflare is well placed to make use of
> Unless you dangle HEFTY stock options with incremental maturity dates
That is indeed how this whole thing works. I used to work with several folks who were kicking around FAANG for 4 years till their acquisition stock fully vested
When you consider how much time/money it takes to hire an experienced engineer, and how quickly they are liable to jump to the competition, acquiring an existing team of experienced engineers and tying them with the golden handcuffs is not a bad deal
If the talent wanted to work at Cloudflair, they'd apply there. Being acquired is a loss of agency and the project you care about is shut down. Several public research papers say retention is hard.
Which also leads to considerable questions about if the thing being shut down in the acquirehire was the real purpose and any momentum of the team itself moving to new projects a bonus.
that just means they might not be actively looking to join cloudflare but are willing to do it if the price is right. nothing wrong with that, it's how employment works for the most part. likewise retention in these cases is typically solved via golden handcuffs, another "the price is right" thing.
I'd say it's durable object specific. Both team deno and cloudflare (and many others) have been won over by the paradigm. Cloudflare is just the primary implementers of it as a strong example of an actor-based programming model at infra layer, but others have been trying to push it (Rivet, and TerseAI's durable actors, celld)
EDIT: like the whole enthusiasm is that they are buying them because they are generalizing a thing to be NOT a cloudflare thing
The writing had been on the wall though, ever since Bun's rapid success with their alternate strategy. Deno quickly started removing its opinionated stances and playing catch-up on Node compatibility.
I loved their original vision, and I'm glad they tried. They had some really cool ideas for a better world of JavaScript, and I do think they placed some pressure on Node and made it better in the process. I'm also glad they're getting a buyout for their hard effort, even though it's probably more about hiring a team of skilled JS runtime engineers than about acquiring the technology.
Funny that with Bun being acquired by Anthropic, if this big bet on AI doesn't work out we'll end up right back where we started; Node. Obviously Deno will still be OSS, Bun would likely end up that way too, but you get the idea
Fundamentally this acquisition is not about Deno the open source project. It’s about buying an amazing team that has built a self-hosted version of Cloudflare Workers that actually doesn’t suck. And that is all about commoditizing the complement.
Deno built celld, which implements the Workers and Durable Objects programming model with self-hosting in mind. Cloudflare says its own distributed infrastructure is too complicated for straightforward self-hosting, and it hadn’t successfully solved that problem. For customers who might be reluctant to commit to being locked in to Cloudflare’s infrastructure, having a rock solid self-hosted alternative reduces that reluctance.
This is a weird strategy to stake future IP value on in the age of AI. With competent and fully qualified team, anyone should be able to reverse engineer this idea and build a roadmap for their own implementation. Especially in the world of open source.
1. They can gain at least a temporary advantage by using a proprietary version. They'll have the original devs who can continue where they were before.
2. I wouldn't be surprised if we end up with a situation where LLM-based copyright laundering becomes illegal/enforced, but only in favor of large corporations' copyright, in which case they could maintain the advantage
What would they miss out on? A bunch of PRslop? The "open source community" is now dead.
Do you really think someone off the street, armed with Opus 5.5 could recreate Deno? Or would you pull Cloudflare people off what they were doing (meaning it's a very inefficient company) to work on this?
At the end of the day, great engineers armed with great tools are going to outperform anyone who just has the great tools.
Phrased as it being merged into the existing, but I can't help but fret a bit. Is cloudflare willing to let their own core compute product be something available to the world? Absolutely sick wins if so. But I worry celld pretty reasonably seen as a threat.
"By bringing celld and workerd together, we want it to be radically easy to build and operate distributed applications on your own infrastructure."
It does not appear they are close sourcing it. He mentions workerd is open source. Roadmap needs better communication but it appears people will be able to switch to new merged OSS version. It's just not well defined what it looks like yet.
I'm happy that the Deno team found a suitable home. Cloudflare is likely the best place for them to land.
I believe they will do great things together. However, I'm a bit concerned that there are very few independent Node.js runtimes: Anthropic acquired Bun, and now Deno will not be developed further.
Somehow I don't believe that Cloudflare doubling down on their own runtime -workerd, which will be likely migrated to Rust soon [1]- is the right choice (since it push on semantics that can only be run on Cloudflare infrastructure). I strongly believe Node.js semantics are likely the right ones for agents.
If anyone is looking for a full-open source alternative to Node.js that can run everywhere (browsers, phones or servers), please be aware that you can rely and use Edge.js [2] (disclaimer: Edge.js is part of the company that I founded: Wasmer)
> since it push on semantics that can only be run on Cloudflare infrastructure
No, workerd and its semantics are not exclusive to Cloudflare infrastructure. People really do run it in production without using Cloudflare at all (I really wish I was allowed to say who because one of the users is hilariously ironic...).
Ryan's and Bert's core focus at Cloudflare is going to be making the self-hosting story better.
> workerd and its semantics are not exclusive to Cloudflare infrastructure
I believe they are. You may be able to run workerd, but you can't run D1 (Sqlite alternative), you can't run KV or Queues (please correct me if I'm wrong).
All those are primitives that already exist in the non CF world: KV can be easily redis/memcached. Queues, Kafka and so on. I believe that a system that reuses those would be stronger.
> I really wish I was allowed to say who because one of the users is hilariously ironic
Ok, this peaked my curiosity. Would be great if you could share it!
> You may be able to run workerd, but you can't run D1 (Sqlite alternative), you can't run KV or Queues (please correct me if I'm wrong).
Details remain to be worked out, but part of the goal of the project is to make all these interfaces plugable with reference implementations that can sit on common infrastructure.
In fact, celld has already done a lot of this.
> Ok, this peaked my curiosity. Would be great if you could share it!
You'll have to find me in person over drinks somehow. ;)
that's an interesting reflection on the nature of open source - in theory the source is there and "the community" could conceivably continue development. especially in the case of something like deno where the people most motivated to keep it alive are already programmers. but the reality is that however distributed an open source project is in theory, in practice it needs a single entity to steward it, otherwise it will die.
hopefully that single entity can be a consortium of companies invested in using the runtime, sort of like opentofu recently.
From a quick search, it looks like they raised $21 million in funding half a decade ago (after an earlier seed round), so this seems less like a reflection on the nature of open source in general and more just a reflection of this one project. It was set up in a way where development was happening because people were being paid to do it, and this time next year, they won't be. Maybe the community would have come in to try to keep it going if there wasn't any funding, or maybe it would have just stopped seeing any real development, but we can't really say for sure either way.
the $21M was presumably not just to develop deno but to build a business around it, which is a much harder problem. this feels like more of a bystander effect problem; if as few as three large companies that benefited from deno were willing to form an "openedeno" foundation and assign one full time employee each to it i'm betting that would be enough to at least sustain the project in a usable state, but of course everyone is hoping someone else will do it.
Maybe in another decade he'll pop up again with a third runtime called something like "Edno" that tries to do things differently than both Node and Deno. There are plenty of permutations of those letters left!
We need them so you can pick and choose the one that works best for your current project.
But that points to an important aspect of the platforms-game: The interface between the runtime and everything else should be standardized, to support true pick-and-choose.
I believe it indicates a healthy market and pushes competition and better outcomes for customers.
In this case, Deno pushed Web primitives for Node.js and Bun pushed forward on speed (and helped Node.js work on their numbers better).
This have a similar analogy with browsers. Back then when Internet Explorer was the only supported browser, the websites were not evolving as fast. When Firefox pushed it forward and then Chrome, customers won (better and faster sites).
US level anti-trust laws don't touch on a lot of anti-competitive behavior, mostly specifically it almost solely concerns just trusts and monopolies. I don't think I've heard of a court case ever before simply on the death of a product.
But also US anti-trust laws at the federal level have always relied on a strong FCC, FTC, and US Attorney General's Office to execute, all of which are currently neutered and/or understaffed under the current administration (and may take years to recover even in the best case scenarios). The US has decided it is a season for trusts and monopolies.
(See the mergers of Paramount and WB into Skydance consolidating 200+ combined years of movie history into a single monopoly under the Oracle nepobaby and almost directly undoing/mocking one of the largest and oldest anti-trust cases which was US v. Paramount Studios which set precedents for how large a movie studio could grow that lasted almost 100 years.)
(There might be something the state of California could do, but I don't know how much they want to get involved.)
US v. Paramount separated movie studios from movie theaters.
Sumner Redstone came from a movie theater family and formed modern Paramount by buying Viacom (which was spun out of CBS due to antitrust), Paramount, and then later CBS itself. He was able to buy Paramount as a cinema owner because the government abandoned the rule that you couldn't own both the studio and the theater in the 80s.
The corporate history of Hollywood is long and complicated. Skydance is obviously a big topic this month, but Paramount was owned by the Redstone family's National Amusements theater for as long as many of the adults on this site have been alive.
National Amusements wasn't considered an official breach of the Paramount decree because it was "the other around", a theater chain owning a studio rather than a studio owning the theaters. It also got a lot of weird exceptions because National Amusements was entirely private at the time.
But the current issue is right now streaming services dwarf theaters today. The Paramount decree was officially suspended by this administration and its courts on this matter stating it isn't a monopolistic oversight for studios to own and entirely control their streaming services (despite doing the exact same things with "originals" and "exclusives" that led to the original Paramount decree). This administration and its courts not only said the current streaming situation is fine, but that it also means the original Paramount decree no longer applies and studios may own theater chains again, because theaters now compete with streaming.
Skydance having both Paramount+ and HBO Max gives them a huge amount of leverage in the streaming space that is going to get stranger with this consolidation, and gets back to why that 200+ years of combined film history is important and relevant.
Do you think Deno was real competition for Cloudflare, and now that they've merged we don't have alternative options for goods/services that are mostly essential?
I think if Cloudflare and Google merged, it still wouldn't be a monopoly because of AWS (and many others).
Workers against Deno Deploy? And even if you don't count Deno as a whole in the same market as Cloudflare it's still shady as hell. They had plans to buy out a company with the explicit intent to shut down their main product.
You would expect them to integrate Deno with Workers, make a new official managed service that would probably become profitable in no time with Cloudflare's cost optimized infra, or at least commit to basic security fixes until the community finds new maintainers.
What they pulled off instead is the most toxic form of acqui hire ever invented.
> They had plans to buy out a company with the explicit intent to shut down their main product.
I understand why it looks that way, and we knew it would be hard to combat this perception.
But it's simply not true.
The actual story is simply this: The Deno team made a strategic decision to refocus on celld, and we (Cloudflare) are excited to support this work, for the reasons I explained in the blog post: https://blog.cloudflare.com/deno-joins-cloudflare/
Fuck me! We’re going to have to start our migration as soon as possible. I knew we were in a precarious spot after the layoffs, but this is a truly sad outcome.
I'm so bummed about this. Deno is by far my favourite JS runtime. I could sense this coming for a while now, but I was hopeful and just waiting to see what happened. Here we are. I'm glad I don't need to get off the runtime immediately. Sad we won't see any innovation like we did in the last 8 years or so.
I hope workerd at least adopts Deno's security mechanisms so it functions as a better sandbox.
One of my favourite projects of 2026 was a configurable LLM harness built around using deno as the runtime. The idea is that the configuration builds a state machine-driven program which is bundled into a binary that can only provide access to the I/O your code explicitly needs. I used it primarily to build interactive programs for colleagues which allow some LLM magic to occur without needing to worry about what they would do with Claude Desktop handling the same data or accessing the same machines and so on. It also allowed for testing local LLMs in deterministic patterns. How do they reason about what to do next when they can evaluate the possible states they can enter, based on the current context? It was really fun. Now I don't really know how I'd rebuild it, knowing I wouldn't use Deno. Maybe that's worth learning anyway.
I loved early Deno and am sad to see it die. I invested heavily in the Deno ecosystem because of Ry’s initial vision for it.
But I stopped because I saw this coming the moment they changed course and started putting npm compatibility as a priority. Deno’s surface area went from beautifully simple to very bloated. I think they felt the pressure of VC funding and just gave up on rebuilding Node from first principles.
The silver lining is that early Deno was so good that Node copied some of its features. So at least we have a better Node now.
Bun's adoption rate (because of its NPM compatibility) was the forcing function; not VC funding. Deno could pursue a slow-and-steady better-will-win approach vs. Node until another runtime competitor appeared with a more seamless node integration. In fact, the VC funding is what made the slow-but-steady strategy possible in the first place.
Strong disagree. Deno could have been a cheaply run open source project with corporate sponsors and could have pursued the slow and steady approach. There's no reason to feel pressure from competitors unless you want to if you're forging a genuinely new path. "Clean break from Node" was the differentiator. Once they abandoned that the reason for using it went away.
The moment they took on VC funding they had to care about competitors and also had to move away from the framework to things like Deno Deploy in pursuit of money.
I doubt deno could have funded its development purely from sponsorship. And Deploy generated real revenue (on its OEM/b2b side).
Jt is interesting to speculate on what might have been had Deno never been a profit-seeking company. But having worked there, I am reasonably confident in my assessment above.
I agree that should it need to be profit making then what’s e got makes sense. But hey, Node isn’t a profit making enterprise. Deno could have been the same.
I only tangentially followed Deno, but am a proud Deno 1 hoodie-haver!
A compatibility shim sounds like a great community run project while the core team could work on the slow-but-steady w/o concerning the core with too much burden of node compat.
Probably because node imcompat / fresh start wasn't the only key differentiator for them?? Bun also had/has (in context of a leg up over node and similar to deno):
- typescript support
- built in linting
- built in package manager command
- built in transpiler/bundler
I'm trying to understand this. Cloudflare wants the people to work on different priorities or cloudflare wants deno to die?
In the case of the latter, I'm wondering why. Most of cloudflares architecture like workers support js runtimes so wouldnt investment into deno be more strategic than other priorities
I'm more thinking of "Deno (the company) lost interest/faith in Deno (the runtime), so they were looking for an out". They like working with runtimes, so Cloudflare is probably a good choice.
I guess this is why so much core staff left suddenly some months ago.
It’s likely that this could be true but they simply have something else they want the acquihired to work on and feel Deno would be a distraction. At least they’re being honest with it instead of letting development stall and all the ill will that comes with the usual slow death by acquisition
RIP, my favorite JavaScript runtime, and thank you. You were too secure for this world.
What kind of business move is this for Cloudflare? celld is a more complete Cloudflare-at-home runtime than current workerd. What does Cloudflare stand to gain from commodizing Workers?
I'll say that although I'm not really a Cloudflare Workers user, I've been eyeing workerd and celld with interest. The idea of a complete backend in a box appeals to me (see also: PocketBase, Algernon). At the same time, the acquisition means that another company won't acquire Deno for celld.
From the Cloudflare blog post, this quote from Kenton Varda (head of Workers):
> "Lock-in" actually hurts us — that's why we went open source
If there were truly no escape hatch from Workers, then some of our largest customers would never have signed on with us in the first place.
> [...]
> Ryan and Bert will be leading a new effort to make workerd self-hosting a first-class supported way to build and run apps using the Workers programming model. This will involve merging code and ideas from celld back into workerd. I'm incredibly excited for this work — I will personally be using it to host an instance of Cloudflare OS in my home.
Love the transition from being secure on my machine to being secure on somebody else's machine. This offers additional security by making it impossible for me to move the code anywhere else. Which solves the common security problem of me moving my business anywhere else.
> there is no a single Durable Objects alternative at the moment
If you live in Elixir land, there's this repo from the Phoenix team, which is quite good. It has pluggable storage, and EKV (https://github.com/chrismccord/ekv) is supported as "batteries include" type storage adapter.
I wouldn’t have imagined cloudflare acquiring Deno. But AI got into both of them and somehow now it makes sense? It’s wild. Anyhow congrats to Deno team.
A lot of the comments are on sunsetting Deno, but the more interesting part is merging the celld model into workerd.
I've been following celld since it was announced. Bootstrapping both durability and coordination off object storage simplifies so many things for self-hosting. (Yes, ironic that self-hosting has a cloud dependency, but in this case I think justified because S3 has become a widely supported protocol that you can run yourself too).
Will be curious to see the details on exactly how that model makes it into workerd.
The plan is to bring the celld model to workerd: run a fleet of workerd instances that use a bucket for coordination and storage. Building on workerd, instead of a separate runtime means our effort isn't split and that APIs are exactly the same in both CF and self-hosted. And of course the deno team will help improve the worker runtime itself.
>A lot of the comments are on sunsetting Deno, but the more interesting part is merging the celld model into workerd.
I think people are focusing on it because if you've built your business on Deno, then the "Deno will have no support in 13 months time" is a bit of an existential risk, and will be a huge time-sink for your team. So it's far more interesting to most of the people reading this page on HN, because HN is full of people who are first-adopters.
I feel it leaves a bitter flavor how Ryan Dahl pushed so hard for Deno and Deno Deploy for years, just to let them die within 1 year and 6 months respectively.
Thankfully I don't have any codebases that heavily use Deno features, otherwise this would be a steep curve now.
Deno's ability to import directly from a package registry or even git repo in a standalone TS script without requiring a package.json or similar 'meta-data' file was actually really nice for shell scripting stuff. AFAIK node.js still can't do anything similar?
I’m happy if this means Deno is able to get a second impulse. I use Deno daily and while it’s true that it’s in this weird position where it’s not sexy like bun or enterprise-y like node, it has a great developer experience. a no-surprises runtime that does a lot of interesting things the right way (like compile to desktop to a browser-less webgpu runtime), the vscode extension is flawless and overall the perfect balance of batteries included without bloat.
of course i’m only talking about deno, the technology not deno, the cloud service.
> I’m happy if this means Deno is able to get a second impulse
Bad news, sorry, the article says:
> We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime.
Sounds like Celld will live on within workerd, Deno is over.
> I’m happy if this means Deno is able to get a second impulse.
From TFA: We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime.
The fact that Deno development is being suspended doesn't mean the community can't step in. The Deno runtime is licensed under MIT. Such forks might be impulse to grow even further.
The majority of the last year's development has been via LLM. I don't think anyone is going to want to fork that when they can just tell an LLM to do whatever and get the same result
Damn. Deno is a super old project, in 2018 the Nodejs creator did the talk "things I hate about NodeJS" and introduced Deno. It's 8 years ago now, and clearly even though the project was known by most Node users, it didn't gain any traction at all. I don't even remember "the bad parts" that Deno tries to solve, were they that bad at all ? Anyways Node will keep evolving and implement new features, new standards, optimization. I think it's super risky to move to an alternative. In the age of the LLMs, if you wanna get out of Node, you better translate all to native Go or Rust.
"old" is relative term. Given @TheRogue's account is 4 years old, maybe new to field. If so, it feels "old".
I understand your sentiment of justifying not being "old". but you gotta bring up "legacy code".
"Working Effectively with Legacy Code" defines legacy code as code without tests thus hard to change it easily or with confidence.
So either @TheGuardian is discussing about the age of software relative to his/her perspective or confused "legacy code" without understanding deno code base.
It's relative measurement. When you are 9th grader, even a freshman college student feels way older.
But as you are in your 30s, you feel less of difference.
Same thing here, How do you define Windows and Emacs being "old"? For those who's been using it for decades, not as old as Voyager software. For those who lived through those times, Windows and Emacs feels younger.
See where I am going with it?
---
If you have a nephew or a kid, they will say you are "old". But your parents will consider you "young" for the rest of their lives.
In the context of software, I think "how old is old" depends on how web based the software has been over its lifetime.
I think 8 years is old for software that has heavily Web based like Deno. But Windows and Emacs have had portions of their lifetime without the Web in a meaningful way, so 8 years would be young.
> "Working Effectively with Legacy Code" defines legacy code as code without tests thus hard to change it easily or with confidence.
This is not a universally accepted definition. I've owned plenty of services with 95%+ unit test coverage, massive integ test suites, and synthetic canary tests that ran every minute that I would consider legacy. Plenty of AI slop today gets barfed out with 100% test coverage, but much of it is legacy from day 1.
Workloads that either are superseded or there is a desire to supersede them. It's not just old deprecated stuff, but also stuff that people want to deprecate.
An example could be old API endpoints only hit by old versions of a mobile app where users may be slow to update. Or a case where only newer clients/instances support modern features and old ones are stuck on a frozen featureset until they cutover.
But active services with no immediately existant alternative may also be legacy. If your auth is behind a disappointing managed service like AWS Cognito, you may consider your entire auth stack legacy while the replacement is still looming in the roadmap down the line. Maybe you can't justify funding to work on a transition just yet, but you already would avoid building on top of the existing tech stack.
It may not be old, but it sure hasn’t caught on much after 8 years. I did remember a lot of posts about migrating cloud functions/lambdas to deno initially, but not much since.
I’m taking the stance that no news is bad news here. If it was good, people would be doing Resume Driven Dev with deno and we would be buried in those articles. Alas.
It's not that old, but it's old enough that it should have gained a bit of traction, it should have been mentioned in more discussions etc. And ultimately adopted more. It's purely a gut feeling though because I didn't run any numbers
To me Deno died the day it decided to not support npm packages and died again when it started supporting it.
Ironically the reason why I hated it when it was introduced was the reason why they added support for npm (i.e. absolute URLs don't support semver and therefore you will load multiple versions)
In what way does supporting npm packages compromise Deno's design? I don't know a lot about Deno but thought it was more about rewriting in Rust, more batteries included like native TS support, and more secure defaults.
Insane, I'm deeply saddened and embittered, I don't want to go back to NodeJS and I don't find any advantage in Bun. I guess this is my sign to just get off of JavaScript entirely.
- there are companies offering serverless functions on their platforms, powered by Deno Deploy. Can this acquisition be an attempt to kill competition?
- Cloudflare now owns a huge chunck of JavaScript ecosystem, like Vercel. They are buying like countries that are arming themselves for war. What is the strategy here?
This might not be seen in much favourable light by many but IMO Cloudflare has the most elegant serveless PaaS as I have seen to date.
The design and architecture is extremely minimal to the point that all of it can be explained on a single A4 page with a 14pt font including D1 + Durable objects. And I hope that it stays that way.
It has all the primitives that you can wish for to build a software system on top of it be it queues, long running jobs, workflows, pipelines, email handlers, cron jobs and even built in AI models ready for you to be invoked.
ATM - it is extremely cheap, reliable, simpler and more capable than anything out there. Deno itself had very little scope anyway because almost no developer tooling is sellable in this environment even more so post AI. Therefore, it is going to accelerate the Cloudflare platform to be the best in class and hopefully not complex and bloated.
I think the biggest thing Cloudflare needs to buy is some sort of Postgres-database service. They've already cornered the market for everything front-end/serverless
Cloudflare could make the biggest impact by doing something similar to AWS DSQL. There are very few options in the multi-region replicated space, and it ties in nicely with their edge workers.
I'm very sad Deno is going away, even though I've never used it nor did I plan to use it.
It is a bit hypocritical in a sense. Similar to how I was sad that a local restaurant recently closed down. In the past two years I went there maybe three times total. But I just liked having it there as an option.
Deno had a ton of good ideas but I just never felt confident that it would have the lasting power. Some of the early decisions, like their initial refusal to fully support package.json and the npm eco-system, made me unsure of their suitability as the basis for a business.
But I always wanted them to succeed. In the same way I always wanted Heroku to succeed even though I never used their service.
More options are better. But I guess "use it or lose it" applies. Did I dodge a bullet or contribute to the downfall?
I'm very surprised they are not running with the runtime. That seemed like Deno's secret sauce? The rest of it is very aligned with Cloudflare already, deploy, kv, workers, etc seems like the lower hanging fruit.
It's almost certainly not worth it. Having less software that you can keep more reliable is almost always worth it over having more software just because it's 10% faster or whatever. This isn't always true but it's mostly true.
It's very sad. I was excited about Deno from day one, and I wanted to see it succeed.
Deno's ability to run TypeScript files - stripping types - was arguably implemented in Node because of Deno. The consolidated tooling approach was a good attempt at solving tooling fragmentation that Node suffers from.
I think for Deno to succeed, it would've had to have been under a non-profit and maybe that can still happen.
It would certainly be nice if someone continued the work. But I wouldn’t hold my breath for it. Seems like an unthankful job (although I’m sure many projects using Demo now would be happy if it’s still supported, at least).
All of this just re-informed my believe to stay with true and tested systems that have survived decades. C if I fell confident and Common Lisp otherwise. Both standardized, have been around for ages, and they don’t disappoint.
I feel bad for anyone that now relies on Deno. And as good as Cloudflare might be for some things, I also feel bad for anyone relying on them.
This is a real bummer. Work never adopted Deno but I love their model, security posture, and the standard library. I've been less interested in typescript recently, but it has turned into the default for frontend.
On the plus side, cloudflare will get access to some fantastic talent, who can hopefully put their effort into building a better web.
We’re in an interesting time for developer tooling. It’s easier than it’s ever been to develop new tools, but harder to monetize or maintain them. We need to figure out what sustainable OSS looks like in the AI age.
It looks like, after Oracle kept on pushing out the deadline for a certain step in the suit process, the parties are in settlement negotiations now [0]; the motion was granted [1], so we might see more info after October 28th.
Does anyone know how many paying Deploy customers there were? The post only offers migration help to paying customers and gives them six months, which makes me think the number is small enough to hand-hold. Millions of runtime downloads and a few hundred accounts on a paid plan can both be true, and only the second one pays for a team.
I had to evaluate Deno vs. Bun vs. Node for a project two years ago, and chose Node. I think Deno has good ideas but often times these projects cannot reach escape velocity, especially when they're constrained by VC motives.
Man the "cute girly sketchbook doodle summarizing a programming thing" is a throwback to a bygone era. I saw that and immediately knew "this is from the late 2010s"
I remember early into my first programming job as an intern in 2017 someone shared a very similar looking series of sketches intended to explain git with cats. I didn't understand it at the time, and then years later when I was much more comfortable with git I took a look at it again and the explanations make just as little sense to me now as it did then.
Genuine question. Why are companies buying our runtimes ? What is the advantage ? Maintaining open source and having more adoption in specific softwares like runtimes and programming languages helps keep software more robust and reliable right ? Am I getting something wrong.
In this specific case, it's probably just aqui-hiring. There's a ton of incredible talent at Deno and Cloudflare can pay them a lot more
Also Deno was starting to try to increase revenue with stuff like Deno Deploy. If Deno did succeed, they would be a direct competitor with Cloudflare Workers
With Bun I think it was basically a marketing ploy. To show that it can be developed by AI and still useful
> With Bun I think it was basically a marketing ploy.
I don't know, the vast majority of daily Microsoft Defender offenders I have to wade through, as well as the majority of the intune remidy requests are related to Node being used in various Microsoft applications. The Azure CLI is one of them, but the one which really ranks high on the security risk levels is always something "Agent" or "AI" related folder which I assume are what runs the Copilot and Cowork clients.
I think I had around 800 CVE warnings in relations to Axios in side a Microsoft tool related to AI running node this week, from just 8 devices.
Bun having it's own batteries included is probably a nice benefit to avoid that.
I was a big fan of deno, so much that I migrated all my cf worker to demo, cause you can run the same engine in there cloud and local/selfhost - perfect no vender lockin(like with cloud flare workers), it's so sad to see it gets shelved.
Deno did bring lot of good ideas and hope some of them will flow into Node, especially full typescript type stripping, package less imports to name a few.
Also worth calling out that if you want to disrupt a major player, you need to be 10x better, not just 2x.
Either way, congrats team. Hope you going on to build something great at Cloudflare.
I'll sound smug saying it but this is always, always inevitable from the moment Deno took VC investment. Either it was going to be successful enough to take over everything (and it wasn't going to be) or it would end up acquired/shut down.
I know Node is boring but it's not going anywhere.
I’ve been using Deno’s permission system as a sandboxed replacement for ‘python -c’ for my agents. Hopefully a better supported runtime (in any language) adds a similar permissions system in the near future.
I have no idea anymore what is happening, and none of the blogposts seem to explain that either. So, if I am to start a new JS or TypeScript project or whatever, what should I choose and why? One runtime used a lot of tokens to rewrite Zig project, one was already Rust, one bought, one rewritten in Go, what is going on?
You should choose Node.js unless you have a good reason to use something else. This is what everyone uses, and it is used widely enough that it's in the same position as Java, i.e. it will be supported forever.
Also the other runtimes only offer incremental improvements.
Regarding the blogposts, you don't read a lot about Node.js because it is mature software and there isn't a lot of drama or new things to talk about.
One was not rewritten in Go. Typescript rewrote its compiler in Go, but that doesn't affect which runtime you use for the resulting Javascript code. Moreover this isn't producing a fork in Typescript as it is a replacement for the previous compiler, at least once they're done with it. The JS runtime forks and churn are not related to Typescript per se.
Yeah, after I posted I realized that Go remark was not correct, but again, I am confused how do you combine all that. JS I can read and understand (well, understand), I have seen it already, TS, I compile TS to JS right, and then I can choose any of the current available runtimes to run that code, correct? And final fat binary that is deployed has what, whatever runtime I choose to be?
Huh, I think I guessed that right, I do use such apps, but never bothered to understand how they are actually packed.
> Typescript rewrote its compiler in Go, but that doesn't affect which runtime you use for the resulting Javascript code.
It unfortunately has other implications, ts-loader (used by webpack) for example is not compatible with the new Go crap so you need to do weird pinning down to v6 to get your builds working again [1].
Yes, everything I have is pinned that way too. That's why I said "when it is done", even in my limited experience and contact with TS it is not currently a suitable replacement, and I'm not a particularly hard user of the tool chain. (I am having a hard time phrasing this in a way that I'm completely sure can't be potentially read as snarky or short-tempered, so I guess I'll just go with the clumsy direct statement that I'm agreeing with you and continuing the thought from my own experience, not trying to disagree.)
As near as I can see, it isn't anything fundamental to the rewrite, it's just a transitional phase, though.
Well, that "Go crap" needs some explanation. The reason I am not involved in JS is because I mostly use Go for backend, and I am happy I have no relation with frontend at all. And even that is just small part of my job and what I do daily (Radius, Diameter, etc.).
But, I never heard about Go crap (in that context maybe), or experienced any crap there, it is just nice and simple. What are the issues?
Many of the "rewrite it in Rust/Go/whatever fad" projects that have cropped up have been done with the assistance of AI, especially because both languages are a pretty heavy divergence if you're used to C, C++, Java or JavaScript.
And when you can't manage to coordinate with an ecosystem dependency as large as webpack before the migration to make sure nothing breaks... my suspicion is utter incompetence and gross misuse of AI.
"which runtime" is a separate discussion from "which package manager"; there's nothing in Node requiring you to use npm (or to rely on external dependencies at all)
I don't choose TS/JS for new projects anymore unless they're browser based. If you need to be in JS land for whatever reason, deploy with Node but do local package management/testing with Bun, because it's way faster for those and you can migrate off without too much pain if it ever becomes problematic.
While it may as well be the same thing, the Anthropic acquisition isn't what turned me off of Bun, it was the vibe-coded Rust refactor. As soon as that happened I dropped Bun. Deno was what I ended up more interested in (Deno Fresh seemed really cool too), but I guess it's just back to Node/PNPM for me now as well. What is going on anymore...
Bun's being a part of Anthropic is just as concerning, if not more so. At least Cloudflare is being honest here that they have no idea continuing Deno support long term. Anthropic's first role in Bun was treating it as a playground to migrate from Zig to Rust using as many LLM tokens as they wished in the process. That's not exactly the sign of a steward with long term maintenance in mind.
Bun's rewrite has been a massive success, unprecedented even.
The amount of new features they are coming up with, the speed of development has been even faster than before.
We have not seen any indications so far Anthropic messing with Bun's direction. It was always Jarred deciding what to do and it is still the same. So far Anthropic has left Bun alone and they are just reaping benefits of bun getting faster and faster.
I see that as a long term benefit. Not a negative.
Bun is dead. It's a skin-walker wearing the appearance of its former self. They screwed the community when they got acquired.
Deno has been successful, technically better and a respectably run project. I expect it may survive in the form of modular runtime and associated features.
Every company that is using Bun is getting so much more perf benefits — faster and less memory used; also less crashes/bugs. New features are dropping rapidly. All those naysayers about rust port will be littered with bugs and unmaintainable crap are already proven wrong. So now you just call it dead. nice.
If Deno and Bun were not kicking NodeJS's behind, we'd not see any of the improvements in the ecosystem in last few years. Node has been stagnant for a long time.
> So, if I am to start a new JS or TypeScript project or whatever, what should I choose and why?
NodeJS for the runtime if it's not in a browser, webpack for bundling. For the frontend stack, either React if you're in for a full application or, fuck it, good old jQuery if you don't want to do type document.queryXXX all the time. You'll find a ton of developers and coding bootcamp graduates to deal with all of that, and the AI agents should all be trained well enough on them.
Everything else is just a recipe for getting rug-pulled or being the bananaware customer responsible for the ripening.
I'd throw out webpack and start with unbundled ESM today. Vendor bundle and spot bundle with esbuild or rollup or something else designed for native ESM bundling and just ESM bundling, and only where you see actual performance bottlenecks (visible request waterfalls). Use any friction you see as an excuse to replace/drop old CommonJS dependencies entirely.
Webpack had its day, but today its kitchen sink and incredibly baroque configurations are as much a liability as a helpful place to start on a project. Start fresh with ESM and without a bundler and things are surprisingly nice in development experience.
If you want to use TS stripping for your own project the typescript ecosystem makes it very easy to avoid using the wrong features. Just set erasableSyntaxOnly and verbatimModuleSyntax to true in your tsconfig.json and you will be warned when you're doing something node would not be able to handle. These days I find more code is being written to be stripping friendly than not, the incompatible stuff is of little importance besides enum for which you could resort to an as const object or a string union. I consider the presence of such things a smell, the TS dev team considers things like enums to have been a mistake, the goal of TS is to remain minimally divergent with JS outside of the type annotations.
Well, it does technically in that to "run TypeScript" all you have to do is strip the types, and execute the remaining JavaScript. This is what Node does, but it doesn't do any typechecking. You can always include TypeScript as a dependency to do the actual type checking for you.
Deno from my understanding included a version of the TypeScript compiler as part of its build. Node doesn't do this. I'm not sure what Bun does, but I wouldn't trust it for anything more than a hobby project.
What happened to React Native? Is it going to be discontinued as well?? We have quite a few customers using it, so we provide a SDK for it. Could be interesting if we can retire that.
What is it with everyone buying runtimes? — P.S. Deno always felt like it is going to be abandoned, you can't build your work on this much shaky ground...
So what's the story with JSR sticking around then? Does it already see meaningful use among people using Workers, or do they just really want an escape hatch in case we see more long-term issues with GitHub and NPM?
And does it at least mean the stdlib will see continued development?
It probably does get that advantage that it has had fewer supply chain attacks than npm.
I liked its scoring system for packages and "make the Typescript docs a public part of the package page" and "focus entirely on ESM-first/ESM-only packages". None of that npm does today, so JSR is still the best way I know to find modern and up-to-date/clean packages versus npm just has a nasty swamp of things still in CommonJS for no reason or that will never get upgraded out of CommonJS because the original maintainers are long gone.
I personally see it as valuable for similar reasons -- plus the ability to just import via web if a package is compatible with browsers, and it being open source and free for the community to fork and rebuild in case something like this goes south.
my recent comment [0]: was deno was the only other tech player building a proper serverless platform to bring Cloudflare workers in an open source manner.
TL;DR: Ryan and co. will be merging celld with workerd to create one first-class open source self-hostable runtime for Workers and Durable Objects. In the post I explain in the post why, contrary to what you might think, this is good business for Cloudflare and we're very excited about it.
I do appreciate that it's not explicitly anti-competitive, but as a biochemist who spent a lot of time thinking about living systems, I am a bit concerned about a budding ecology that has perhaps collapsed <3
But I do have a strangely high trust in the individuals involved (you, Ryan, Sunil, others), even though I am a bit perplexed by CloudFlare's incentives or economics
Which is to say: I am choosing to be optimistic :)
Caveat, am commenting before reading, mind you -- just my general reaction to mergers in a world that never cleaves :)
EDIT: though this has also probably deflated a lot of the good-faith conversations I was having with gov-adjacent Europeans about celld being a boon for the moment of heightened European sovereignty, where EU data residency isn't necessarily considered enough distance anymore.
It's a joint decision and I agree with it. I'm most invested in its success and have put the most work into it - and I no longer think it's where I can do the most important work. There are some good ideas in Deno and it's well engineered - but it ultimately is not solving big problems. It has been sucked into the gravity well of node compatibility, which forces it to behave exactly as Node does. Why reimplement Node? It works. Marginal performance or UX or security benefits are not enough.
I'm interested in building powerful new abstractions. celld has been working remarkably well, depending only on object storage for coordination and persistence. It is not just a slightly different API to interact with the file system or network - it's an entirely new model for server development. I wrote a bit about it here: https://x.com/rough__sea/status/2105853283617440032
We'll ship monthly releases for a year, and Deno stays MIT-licensed. If people want to carry it forward, I'd like that.
> once you see it, you'll realize there's no point to traditional javascript runtimes in serving applications - only for build processes (eg bundling) and scripting.
I suspect he's come to the conclusion that the runtimes are now just a commodified build system that's been dialed in already, and the layer where celld sits is where the next unvalidated opportunities are
This is actually awesome news believe it or not. I'm excited b/c i think there's a lot of potential in the world w/ deno's team being on solid footing w/ cloudflare.
I know the runtime is in trouble, but i'm not as worried tbh b/c the principles deno championed are going to keep going.
I mean, sure, but this doesn't preclude CF from keeping a few people around who can work on the runtime while everyone else does... whatever CF wants them to do.
They don't even need to be the long term stewards either. Spend some time setting up a proper governance structure for Deno, hand it off, and then pay some maintainers to continue their existing effort.
At least how it's stated in the post, it really feels like an "ah good luck everyone, I'm out!" sorta deal, which seriously sucks for everyone who really believed in Deno.
> We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime.
create a plan to implement a javascript runtime similar to {deno,bun,node.js,whatever} in {Rust,C++,ASM,Go,Fortran} language, use subagents @ max effort, keep building until you're done, follow instructions according to INSTRUCTIONS.md
Disappointing news to see it shut down, but maybe the writing was on the wall after they laid off some of their folks.
I've been using deno for years and built some nontrivial services in it. When deno added support for npm packages, the early days were pretty rough. I ran into lots of issues with packages and spent a lot of time reading random github issue threads. It's been pretty smooth sailing for the last year or so though.
At least I can use ai to help migrate off of deno.
Man, this year has been nothing but bad news for me. This is disappointing, and really makes me question what is the point if even open source is now this easily enshittified or "killed by [insert big tech co here]." I've spent years now using Deno nearly exclusively for new projects, and saw it as the most sane JS server runtime. This also makes me hesitant to use anything with Ryan Dahl's name on it ever again.
Especially with LLMs automating all sorts of code and operational aspects, we could do Tcl/Lua type whitelist sandboxes where the application can only call a limited set of functions.
I think it makes more sense to use the kernel‘s’s sandboxing utilities (like seccomp, SELinux, namespaces, prctl and eBPF) than to rely on the process to try to isolate itself purely in userspace which will always have holes.
Congrats. But also terrible news for the ecosystem; this project was a bit doomed from the start, and they acknowledge it multiple times (implicitly), but nice to have competition, I guess.
Ultimately I only trust Node.js to succeed. Bun being too deep into "shipping anything that increases usage".
It's sad how it worked out. Bun really stole Deno's momentum. Deno's foundational trust model really feels like its what the JS community needs. There were so many genuine improvements over Node that I don't think Node can ever just adopt
> The Deno team is joining Cloudflare to radically simplify self-hosting Workers and Durable Objects so developers can use the same primitives in more places.
Honestly, this motion right here is the death of open source - the rug pull. I no longer can trust any open source project won't get bought up and sunsetted. I'm glad open tofu and valkey and Linux exist to serve as a counter example but this makes me sad.
It's not the death of open source. It will probably be the death of small company open source. Either 100% community/non profit or 100% big corporation and users check corporate alignment with project goals.
I took the plunge and ripped out all my (“open source”) Magento shopfronts and reimplemented them from the ground in…… 2 hours. And it is so much more performant to boot.
This. Internally as of about two months ago I use _zero_ open source code in any of my projects. Anything that I was still relying on was 100% rewritten with an LLM. The only hard dependency remaining is the Linux kernel itself which I predict I'll be able to replace in a few months. The current rewrite is functional except for networking and wider driver support.
So both major (and the only meaningful) possible Node alternatives have been absorbed into proprietary monoliths in the last year. We all know how well the Joyent years went, RIP to open source innovation at this point.
No if that were true they wouldn't be stopping development of Deno, which as it stands sits in the best position for codemode given it's granular sandboxing.
I agree it would be an awkward choice for an agent that runs as a local application, but the trend I think is towards agents running more and more on servers.
> Deno people probably just want a paycheck after they spent years seeking glory and money on something that other people used but didn't pay them a cent for.
My take: Opensource-Infrastructure-as-startup-but-also-charity is a thing that is going to die along with ZIRP. I don't know why VCs ever sniffed around things like this in the first place. The younger generation that followed this business model with liberal "take my stuff" licenses and sneered at GPL etc are learning the hard way that making a nice cool thing and getting noticed is not going to earn you a good living. (And other people will make millions off your passionate work.)
> We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime. Deno will remain open source, and we welcome others who want to continue its development.
So Deno is going to be unsupported and will no longer be maintained and will be discontinued.
It looks like "written in Rust" is not enough for a selling point and lost out to the fierce competition against Bun.
Deno wasn't doing well and was repeatedly outperformed in downloads and raw performance when Bun was written in Zig, and even before Bun got acquired by Anthropic.
My point is, even if Bun stayed on Zig, Deno still struggled to compete regardless of the language used.
I'd guess Deno failed because of the original decision of not supporting node_modules, instead went with a different way of handling dependencies. Else the native typescript support would most likely had pushed them to bigger success past nodejs.
Though nodejs was even then quite solid in it's position, so maybe it would not have made a difference.
Sorry, but even factoring in that this acquisition carries over the existing customer base and goodwill, this is still **** (censored because I aim to stay polite). Deno is factually speaking a one to two week project at this point (proven by the numerous JS runtimes already on the market). I genuinely do not see how this makes any sense whatsoever. If Cloudflare was seeking to hire the team behind Deno they could have done it at a fraction of the price paid. This, naturally, assumes they did pay anything and I can't be bothered to look up the exact $$$ amounts.
I think Deno’s VC money ran out (see the layoffs a few months ago) and Cloudflare offered a stable, well paying job, maybe with stock options.
Just this morning I checked the Deno blog (again like so often in recent weeks) to see if they are still alive. The number of mentions in Hacker News posts and comments was zero in recent weeks. The project was basically dead or abandoned already. Sucks, because I went all-in on Deno.
As a bystander, I'm excited by this. I don't know what it'll be, but I have a sense some interesting, powerful, and secure new ways of shipping code could come from this marriage...
Time and again, staying on the mainstream node/npm stack continues to be the validated choice. I've seen this happen with io.js, bun, and deno. The situation has been similar for yarn/bun and most alternatives on the package manager side.
Of course, that's not to say the work done on these platforms was wasted. The divide around io.js was meaningful to getting things moving faster and change the governance structure. Deno and bun both showcased things Node could be doing better and some of that was folded back in.
And in spite of all those past experiences, I still find myself using pnpm over npm today. I'm sure npm will continue to evolve and eventually the critical features of pnpm will just be part of core npm. But the gap today is massive enough that pnpm over npm feels critical. The disk usage and performance wins are life-changing for daily work and CI flows.
> We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime. Deno will remain open source, and we welcome others who want to continue its development.
So unless someone else picks up development, Deno will no longer be supported.
This is a wild detail to just bury at the bottom. So many companies went all-in on Deno in recent years. Some even did major migrations off Node.js. Sucks for them I guess, but that's always the risk in chasing the shiny new thing over sticking to the old and dependable.
You can migrate off deno in a single day. It's not a big deal.
Exactly that. I am really surprised by the amount of comments with this huge sentiment and doom mongering. These days it’s really not a big deal. Million lines of deno based ts is not a problem because pretty much any functionality provided to deno is available for node as well. You probably can migrate off much of the external deps without much hassle. You can even migrate to different language ecosystem altogether like others have mentioned in comments.
> ...pretty much any functionality provided to deno is available for node as well.
Unfortunately Node still can't do something like this out of the box (AFAIK at least):
Such direct imports are basically the killer feature of Deno for simple standalone tooling scripts in otherwise non-JS/TS projects, e.g. it made TS a perfect replacement for Python even without a "batteries included" standard library.Deno also has a builtin TS type checker, linter, formatter, test runner with coverage support, package manager, language server etc etc... In node these are all separate (and often 3rd-party) tools.
This doesn't seem like a big deal. Don't you just npm install whatever you need and then change the import names?
I don't want the install step. That's redundant. Just a .ts script I can run via `deno run bla.ts` and which directly pulls in any dependency it needs from the web.
Bun has auto-install for you, but you do have to enable it.
I understand the point of this, just saying an existing codebase importing things this way doesn't seem all that hard to convert if you need to get off Deno.
FWIW, almost this exact syntax for imports (without the `npm:` prefix) is supported for standalone scripts with Bun.
this one is actually a bad pattern to avoid.
Only when you have no control over the version you're pulling in, but the semver resolution works as expected. Also we're talking about small standalone 'shell scripts', not 'real projects'. Think 'bla.sh', just with a .ts extension. Deno is really great for such small helper scripts.
It's one of those things that the technical aspect is simple but the paperwork dehumanizes me. Just a couple more bullshit engineering design documents to generate
what other runtime has runtime security features?
Node only has experimental permissions support (making it not as good for local scripts), and no WebGPU (though you can import dawn wrapper). Deno desktop is way ahead of anything available for Node.
And this is why deno is exiting.
There's no business here anymore.
Exactly. Probably an hour if you just tell your model of choice to do it for you and implement a logical testing framework.
Exactly why any company that cares about long term maintenance should stick with Node.js except in cases that justify alternative runtime.
I wouldn't be surprised if Bun is abandoned at some point as well.
(Which is why I am happy to see new runtimes but never care enough to seriously use or adopt them.)
As long as the competition forced Node to become better then it's all good.
Communities aren't always in competition with one another.
Yes they are. If opensource product A does not have better features than competing opensource product B, uses move to the better product A and pretty soon, almost nobody will use product B. Take BSD vs Linux for example. We get "we've migrated to BSD" or "we've migrated to Linux" posts all the time and arguments for one or the other. Is there a winner and loser? Yes. Larger communities, more developers, more corporate sponsors, more contributions, etc. Certainly looks like competition to me.
I guess "joining" was the key word here. But I'm not particularly surprised now that I see it meant acquihire.
Well, the license Deno is distributed under explicitly warns you (sorry for all caps):
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
Node is old I’ll give you that. Dependable is debatable.
I went all-in with bun. Did I bet wrong?
What did it get you?
For my projects, I am used to maintaining package manager configuration, bundlers, linters etc.
So I never had much interest in looking into benefits of Deno or bun.
As a former bun user, speed.
However I now work with software that requires PQC resistance and node's native ML-KEM and ML-DSA abilities made me switch back. Also I'm not particularly an Anthropic fan so that was also a separate nail in its coffin for me.
Now I'm fascinated why you've chosen the node/npm ecosystem for something with such high security requirements. Are you doing anything special to deeply pin dependencies, etc.?
Finding the right balance of "being responsive to bugfixes, some of which may patch disclosed zero-days" and "not allowing a compromised package to be installed" is tough, these days.
npm has supported min-release-age since Februrary, both that and pinned dependencies are stuff I think everyone should be doing. wrt sensitive environments, I can't say too much about our internal processes but we have an audited private registry among other things. for containers, Iron Bank provides a free and publicly accessible baseline https://p1.dso.mil/iron-bank to build on top of.
As a non-js developer, Bun compiles my ts code to local executables nicely. Allows me to experiment with the new diversity of ts frameworks and distribute the binaries (hobby scope).
I'm using Vercel PKG to compile my JS code to executables "nicely".
But PKG is not supported by anyone any more (?) and it has an upper limit on the version of Node.js base-image it will support.
If Bun supports compiling executables nicely I hope that feature somehow stays alive and is migrated to other runtimes. Or maybe it can become a standalone tool for exe-compiling?
I mean I used to do a lot of things I'm glad I don't have to anymore. I'm not a big fan of doing repetitive work just because I understand how to.
Node at least picked up --run, TS stripping support, .env loading, watch mode, and sqlite (plus some other things I'm probably forgetting) since Deno started so at least theres that.
I also don't like repetitive work, but I think it can be beneficial to understand how the tools you use work, and bun/Deno seem to abstract much of it away.
Random example: I've worked with many frontend developers who seemed to believe listing dependencies in package.json in devDependencies instead of 'dependencies' controls what ends up in the production bundle.
I'm under the impression few understand that this is only a cosmetic distinction unless you use the package manager's --omit=dev or --production flags during install.
What is included in the production bundle is of course determined by the bundler's dependency-graph reachability from the entry point.
For people who never configured these tools themselves, it's probably difficult to understand how the modern web stack works.
However, nowadays you can probably have AI explain it to you well enough while it fixes the issues.
Silly drive by take:
> I've worked with many frontend developers who seemed to believe listing dependencies in package.json in devDependencies instead of 'dependencies' controls what ends up in the production bundle.
If so many believe that it’s how it should work, maybe it just should work that way. Principle of least surprise and all that.
You can and probably should set up your production builds that way but it's not automatic.
It also gets messy if you're building 2 or 3 services simultaneously out of the same node_modules dir. E.g frontend, backend, shared, scripts...
How would you set that up?
Like say you installed only the production dependencies, then you'd be missing the build tools, bundler, etc.
One idea would be to use hooks of your bundler to enforce that each module resolved during the production build is declared in the regular dependencies.
It would be far from a standard solution though.
https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import/blob/HEAD/...
It's not built in to ESLint, but it's fairly widely used in my experience and helps ensure that you've got a sensible split between production and non-production.
NX Monorepos work that way. Broadly speaking (and with many exceptions) all packages end up in the root. It “builds” release distributions with the correct package.json files and transpiled js.
It helps keep all your related packages on the same dependencies. It’s hell for react native sometimes though.
I don't see what you mean.
With nx you define the dependencies between your tasks, so that the packages build in the right order and with caching.
I do not think it changes anything about how packages are installed by the package manager or bundled by the bundler.
You can declare build tools in either the root package.json or packages/a/package.json, and I don't think anything prevents you from bundling something declared in devDependencies.
On second thought, I see now that you probably mean it helps keep shared dependencies at the same version when you declare them in the root package.json.
That's a feature of npm/pnpm/yarn workspaces though, not nx itself. And it only works with bundled dependencies, since they would be undeclared in the package itself and thus couldn't be installed externally. If you need that, I think pnpm catalogs would be the right tool.
One should understand how their tools work but there's no such thing as doing that without understanding things across the abstractions involved and at least a good portion of what happens under them, Deno or not.
It works the same way you use a bundler instead of assembling your own and so on and so forth down the tree. The farther down the tree, the less focus you should give your understanding to, but that's not an excuse for giving no understanding below the first layer.
Yup, Bun is at the mercy of Anthropic, and we know the extents they go to protect their competitive advantage.
"we know the extents they go to protect their competitive advantage"
I don't. What do you mean?
Use bun when it's drop in replacement of npm, never use Bun API itself.
Bun always seemed weird because they decided to build it with Zig. I want Zig to succeed, but it's not stable yet.
It reminds me of game engines. If you want to make a game engine, there's nothing wrong with that, but you should acknowledge that you're building a game engine, not a game--or rather, if your goal is to make a game, starting by making a game engine probably isn't optimal.
It's the same for Bun. It's clear that they wanted to build a JavaScript runtime, and also they wanted to use Zig. They are doing both of these things, but when push comes to shove, their desire to use Zig was more important than their desire to make a JavaScript runtime, I believe.
As of bun 1.4, it's all rewritten in rust instead of zig: https://bun.com/blog/bun-v1.4
Bun was converted fully into Rust overnight, works fine so far.
Didn’t they switch to Rust?
How will this affect those of us relying on those projects? It's not just those companies but also the customers of those companies.
I lead a project built on Deno; it was not my call, just to be clear. Deno turned out unfortunately to be a miss and we had seen the writing on the wall. FWIW, we're moving to a much bigger Rust core program with node for JS user extensibility. (In other words, I'm not willing to risk using the deno_core crates.)
The one silver lining here is that Deno had already increased their node/npm compatibility. Migrating off of the jsr ecosystem and back to npm is going to be less painful than one might imagine. I expect present LLMs to be sufficiently good at the task, for example.
Can you elaborate on why it was a “miss”?
A few things off the top of my head (we've been on deno since 2022)
- They originally bet on being a TypeScript dialect that didn't quite match the expectations of node in a few small places that ended up mattering hugely.
- One of the original value propositions was "deno compile" and "deno bundle", and those never actually worked well enough to be robust for our real-world use cases (early on they didn't support TLA, then dynamic imports didn't work, then they had issues with ARM compilation)
- Then they simultaneously tried to support node syntax out of the box with npm import specifiers _and_ create a new javascript registry (jsr.io)
- At the point where we expected them to actually make their base-level ecosystem robust, they pivoted to edge compute, and then the writing was on the wall
LLMs writing rust that no one reads will spell doom for all the server side JS stuff in time.
Do these runtimes have some value today? Sort of. But the cost of reimplementing them goes down, down, down. I made two bespoke JS runtimes within a year. Next year it will be even easier.
Deno/Bun see the picture better than I do, and they decided it was the right time for an acquihire.
I wonder how much they have financially contributed to Deno.
At least open source gives them an opportunity for the community to find a way to support it going forward. But I suppose that's just table stakes these days.
Asking as a non-JS person - what's the cost and effort to switch?
It probably depends on how much of the deno-specific api is being used, and then how similar that is to whatever you're going to switch to.
https://docs.deno.com/api/deno/
Anybody who has been bitten by the many issue with Yarn over the years can tell you, just stick with stock tools and deal with it.
It's why I usually look more closely at the comments here than at the story for stories like this.
I was really surprised that cloudflare was acquiring deno to be honest, I have written about this here before, Deno was always sort of dead to me due to how little they cared for compat of all kinds (nodejs, CJS, backwards). It was refreshing to see bun care a lot about it (well, now its on a different path in other ways).
Then I read that paragraph, and it made more sense that they're acquihiring + killing.
The way i see it, cloudflare acquired celld. Deno was just given a decent burial as part of the package
> I was really surprised that cloudflare was acquiring deno to be honest
It's an acquihire. They hired the people behind Deno
And seems they want to compete with Anthropic, by having expertise on JS runtimes? A big feature I think is the ability to produce an executable application and have your AI agent-tools work well with that.
https://i.postimg.cc/d13vq3fk/x.png
>So many companies went all-in on Deno in recent years.
Companies went all-in in a barely established niche player with 1/100 the traction, instead of sticking with Node, and even better an LTS Node, and are now surprised?
Do they also do their front-end in Dart?
For me Deno has a really nice security posture, the permissions model is just something I haven't seen in from other runtimes (JS or otherwise). There were other nice features (native typescript support, compilation to a standalone binary), but the permissions model was just unique.
https://docs.deno.com/runtime/fundamentals/security/
Which Node now has:
https://nodejs.org/api/permissions.html - since v20 - Apr 17, 2023
https://nodejs.org/learn/typescript/run-natively - stable and without a flag since v22.18.0 - which sometime after Apr 24, 2024 which was the v22.0.0 release
https://nodejs.org/api/single-executable-applications.html - Added in: v19.7.0, v18.16.0 but still in Active Development (not stable yet) - 2022
For reference, Deno was released in 2020 with all of these features from the start.
Feels like it always take some healthy competition for Node to make big strides like this. Like the whole io.js fork thing a long while ago.
You can give permissions to Web Workers when starting them in Deno, which afaict Node cannot do.
I didn't know node got that too but it says right at the start that malicious programs can bypass it. What's the point then?
The Docker of JS runtimes. Deno will get picked up by the community. But CF should sponsor it for at least 250k a year.
The security model has always been a half-baked afterthought. The initial versions were riddled with vulnerabilities .
Like a decade ago I got into a huge fight with a Staff Eng at our company over Dart. I had just been put in charge of the company's architecture and one of the first things I did was migrate everything to TypeScript (which was relatively new at the time). He was so angry I didn't pick Dart. Good choice by me in retrospect (though picking Angular 2 over React not so much).
I don't know enough about Angular 2 to know exactly how much of a bad choice that was, but my experience in React has always been "they should have used something else". I vaguely recall our lead backend being unhappy with his decision to do the original admin panel in Angular, but I chalked that up to him not being a frontender.
For context: I begrudgingly adopted Vue a while ago after finding React to be too unwieldy, and part of that opinion is definitely related to a poorly written Redux implementation.
> though picking Angular 2 over React not so much
It sounds like you're coming at this from a perspective of popularity and thus access to engineering candidates with expertise in it which is fair, but speaking as someone who also went with Angular 2 over React during those times, I'm still using Angular and I'm very happy with it from a technical perspective. Yes, it does mean there are less options for hiring, but it has been a positive experience for my team and for me in my own projects to stick with it.
My dart story. While in college for computer programming our professor telling us if we wanted to get ahead of the curve start learning dart. It was the future
It's really a bummer that Dart gets a bad rap, because of its early versions. The recent versions of Dart are a lovely language to work with. Pub is the only package manager I've used that approaches Cargo in quality.
All TypeScript competitors got out-engineered by Microsoft. It’s a triumph of experience over new ideas.
How well designed the initial versions of TypeScript were can be seen by how smoothly later versions were able to build on them, and even after so many major improvements the language has barely a wart (enums probably being the only one).
namespaces are the other one, and that's a fun legacy because Typescript had to implement a half dozen module systems in the early days: no modules (jQuery-era globalThis pollution), AMD, UMD, CommonJS, SystemJS, Typescript's own which was proto-ESM inspired but not ESM, then Typescript's realignment with ESM.
Something of its own sign of Microsoft out-engineering some of the hiccups of the ecosystem as a whole. (I started using Typescript < 1 simply because it was the safest and easiest way to write AMD modules also with an eye to UMD or SystemJS output with just a compiler flag change if you needed to ship something compatible outside the house.)
> He was so angry I didn't pick Dart. Good choice by me in retrospect (though picking Angular 2 over React not so much).
1/3rd of apps on the iOS and Android app store use flutter and that percentage is growing over time. Whereas people are moving away from JS/TS frameworks like React Native.
I wonder if TS could evolve into a compiler whose output would use either Deno, Bun or Node? When the exe is compiled it no longer matters what libraries it uses underneath?
Where is that stat from?
well Deno was the only player who could have prevented recent npm security disasters:
built-in permission system for filesystems and etc
just forbid writing to important folders like ~/.ssh
But it is Open Source, so if said companies like Deno enough, all they have to do is pay for its continued maintenance and development. This is one major thing that sets Open Source apart from proprietary software.
> Do they also do their front-end in Dart?
Hey, you jest, but Flutter has a lot of traction!
(I conceptually like Flutter, but I can't get over the Dart thing, so I'm not part of that traction.)
Slack? I think some of their plugins API was all Deno based for a while.
Netlify and Supabase have also been using them for edge functions.
Given these two are both comparable to the Cloudflare developer stack that I often think of as alternatives, this makes the decision to let Deno die feel at least a bit more calculated.
I do wonder if it's been shopped around to any of these large-scale users as potential maintainers. Seems in the overall wheelhouse for Supabase in particular.
> Do they also do their front-end in Dart?
This is actually a good decision though.
> Companies went all-in in a barely established niche player with 1/100 the traction, instead of sticking with Node, and even better an LTS Node, and are now surprised?
Wait till you hear about this thing called Bun.
Though with a tiny core team and almost carte blanche AI credits, they are a lot leaner.
> Though with a tiny core team and almost carte blanche AI credits, they are a lot leaner.
Bun's release cadence dropped like a rock after the rewrite, in spite of the radical AI militancy and virtually infinite AI budget.
They shipped a metric ton of new features in 1.4 and it seems relatively stable enough that it doesn't require too much hot bug fix releases.
Radical idea here, but maybe those many companies could _fund_ the development of key components of their infrastructure.
Indeed, seems like it should be pretty straightforward.
I understand why the venture-backed entity couldn't do this, but given the reactions here, could a new maintainer not take over and simply charge for support and future enterprise features like the Sidekiq guy?
Maybe but only if that gives them a competitive advantage.
Honestly migrating back is trivial now. It just isn't that big of a pain.
> So many companies went all-in on Deno in recent years.
They should hire a few devs to develop it then.
Seems like an extremely risky thing to do. Luckily they can keep maintaining it and improving it if their business is truly dependent on it.
The yt-dlp project uses Deno as its default and preferred JavaScript runtime when downloading YouTube videos (this replaced their own handwritten JS interpreter). Fortunately yt-dlp also has support for Node and QuickJS as well as deprecated support for Bun, but I don’t think any of those were preferred by the project for various reasons such as portability, security and I think also speed.
See https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/14404, https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/15012, and https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/wiki/EJS.
QuickJS works fine for yt-dlp and is way smaller: less than 1 MB vs 34 MB + its many dependencies for Deno.
See https://github.com/denoland/deno/discussions/9811
For asynchronous downloading of huge media files, speed should not be a priority?
Afaik it's used more for circumventing anti-bot measures and solving challenges than the download handling itself.
This is accurate (maintainer of downstream project that depends on yt-dlp for archiving operations).
When downloading huge media files, the only speed you're being limited by is your bandwidth.
Everything else is completely negligible.
As I recall, they picked Deno over Bun during the whole vibecoding rewrite fiasco from six months ago, and there wasn't a ton of explanation given beyond the general vibe of "ai bad". They might reevaluate that in light of things being generally fine and losing their precious handcoded runtime choice.
> there wasn't a ton of explanation given beyond the general vibe of "ai bad"
I'm very bullish on AI, but vibe-porting the piece of software you're the main maintainer over a few weeks without letting anyone in the community know and pushing that as a fait accompli to both your userbase and your open source community is definitely the kind of behavior that makes you not trustworthy enough to depend on.
as a counterpoint, your fears are hypothetical so far - nobody on earth cares as much about bun as the bun team and if it was good enough for them it is probably good enough for 99% of users
i think someone who has built their infra on top of bun and have bills to pay care much more about bun stability than the team who get paid by Anthropic to vibecode an entire rewrite to another lang
> someone who has built their infra on top of bun and have bills to pay
they were stupid to do this in the first place. bun has always been a one man show. what were their plans for when he got hit by a bus?
The vibecoded rewrite led to the deprecation of support for Bun but I believe Deno was already the default. Also Bun had the note “No permission restrictions available. Scripts have full file system and network access.”
If I remember correctly, Deno was always priority number 1 due to having a permissions system. Bun's removal due to the rewrite had people complaining using Deno as the focus as Deno's development shifted towards being LLM heavy. Node now supporting permissions would likely be the priority now.
There was a ton of criticism beyond "ai bad". A complete rewrite, in a different language, is a brand new project. It doesn't have any where near the hardening as the previous version thousands of deployments. If they had done that exact same thing but without AI people still would have been upset.
> As I recall, they picked Deno over Bun during the whole vibecoding rewrite fiasco from six months ago, and there wasn't a ton of explanation given beyond the general vibe of "ai bad".
Your comment is baffling. Either you lost track of the story or you've opted to post a very simplistic take on the whole Bun fiasco. Bun's ill-advised rewrite had zero technical grounds and the radical drop in release cadence in spite of all the AI backing suggests the project's foundation lays on shaky ground.
I don't think that's a good interpretation of what happened.
Bun's release cadence dropped because they had just ported to a new language and they weren't about to release that to their community without letting it settle in for a couple of months first - which they did, by running it in Claude Code on millions of computers.
‘Acquires’ is an interesting word, given they’re hiring people and sunsetting the product. They didn’t buy Deno, they hired the team that built it and that forces them to abandon the project.
Language really means nothing these days…
(Yeah I’m salty, I got all in on Deno a year ago.)
So "Deno" isn't joining Cloudflare, Deno is effectively defunkt and its former team is joining Cloudflare.
jsr is moving to cloudflare.
isn't that fairly irrelevant if Deno dies out? Does anything else use JSR?
JSR packages can run on Node.js, Bun, Cloudflare Workers, etc. The maintainer uploading the package decides which runtimes are supported.
I tried using JSR for about a week, but the restrictions were so tight I gave up.
It’s immutable npm, you can’t unpublish I believe but yeah it’s trick of allowing one to publish typescript packages rather than compiled js only applies to deno.
What is in this for Cloudflare? Just the employees? I can't imagine hiring these days is that hard that it's worth creating this much ill will.
I don't like how that's in the Deno post but gets no mention in the Cloudflare post. Seems like a pretty important detail!
I think it’s covered appropriately for the audiences. The two posts are for different audiences and purposes. The Deno post by Ryan is for the Deno audience, which is mention at the top of his writing on the Cloudflare post that is for a broader audience of what this means for the Cloudflare audience: “For more on what's happening to the Deno runtime and our various efforts, see my post on the Deno blog.”
FWIW both Ryan and Kenton are very transparent in person, in public, and online over their professional careers. They will and do openly change their minds based on new information and opportunities as time goes along. Both are now founders of open source projects acquired by Cloudflare for the technical architecture talents seeing a future that they would like to build.
There's no need to excuse this behavior. People who write announcements like this are dishonest to their core.
Definitely negative karma points for Cloudflare.
well I just don't get it -- why?
unless cloudflare's CEO is a friend of cloudflare people, so just want to financially them bail out...
...why acquire and kill? cloudflare can have more outreach and reputation by keeping deno alive
> why? unless cloudflare's CEO is a friend of cloudflare people, so just want to financially them bail out...why acquire and kill?
Aquihiring is a time-tested strategy to build out a team. The Deno folks likely have a bunch of experience that Cloudflare is well placed to make use of
Aquihiring also requires the personnel hired to... actually stay with the company....
Unless you dangle HEFTY stock options with incremental maturity dates, nothing is else is keeping them from leaving.
> Unless you dangle HEFTY stock options with incremental maturity dates
That is indeed how this whole thing works. I used to work with several folks who were kicking around FAANG for 4 years till their acquisition stock fully vested
When you consider how much time/money it takes to hire an experienced engineer, and how quickly they are liable to jump to the competition, acquiring an existing team of experienced engineers and tying them with the golden handcuffs is not a bad deal
> acquiring an existing team of experienced engineers and tying them with the golden handcuffs is not a bad deal
well... why not tie who's already inside the company (who you actually know about) instead of an external people (who you DON't know about)?
it's much difficult to get info about some external person, and most info is about external reputation ('the looks')
though... that's the reason job-ping-pongs work: someone outside looks better than someone inside, because of your lack of info
If the talent wanted to work at Cloudflair, they'd apply there. Being acquired is a loss of agency and the project you care about is shut down. Several public research papers say retention is hard.
Which also leads to considerable questions about if the thing being shut down in the acquirehire was the real purpose and any momentum of the team itself moving to new projects a bonus.
that just means they might not be actively looking to join cloudflare but are willing to do it if the price is right. nothing wrong with that, it's how employment works for the most part. likewise retention in these cases is typically solved via golden handcuffs, another "the price is right" thing.
I assume the logic is something like this:
- We want to do more work on our runtime and need people to do it
- Those developers for that company over are there working on another runtime
- Buying that company allows them to come work for us without any potential issues from investors in that other company
So they don't want to buy Deno, they want to buy the team to work on something cloudflare specific.
I'd say it's durable object specific. Both team deno and cloudflare (and many others) have been won over by the paradigm. Cloudflare is just the primary implementers of it as a strong example of an actor-based programming model at infra layer, but others have been trying to push it (Rivet, and TerseAI's durable actors, celld)
EDIT: like the whole enthusiasm is that they are buying them because they are generalizing a thing to be NOT a cloudflare thing
Oof.
The writing had been on the wall though, ever since Bun's rapid success with their alternate strategy. Deno quickly started removing its opinionated stances and playing catch-up on Node compatibility.
I loved their original vision, and I'm glad they tried. They had some really cool ideas for a better world of JavaScript, and I do think they placed some pressure on Node and made it better in the process. I'm also glad they're getting a buyout for their hard effort, even though it's probably more about hiring a team of skilled JS runtime engineers than about acquiring the technology.
RIP Deno
Funny that with Bun being acquired by Anthropic, if this big bet on AI doesn't work out we'll end up right back where we started; Node. Obviously Deno will still be OSS, Bun would likely end up that way too, but you get the idea
but even in that scenario, the node competitors absolutely spurred new energy and innovation in node, as node themselves have acknowledged
This is the real headline... and more so that it has been hidden away.
Why would they acquire them then shut it down? Is there a reason for that?
Fundamentally this acquisition is not about Deno the open source project. It’s about buying an amazing team that has built a self-hosted version of Cloudflare Workers that actually doesn’t suck. And that is all about commoditizing the complement.
Deno built celld, which implements the Workers and Durable Objects programming model with self-hosting in mind. Cloudflare says its own distributed infrastructure is too complicated for straightforward self-hosting, and it hadn’t successfully solved that problem. For customers who might be reluctant to commit to being locked in to Cloudflare’s infrastructure, having a rock solid self-hosted alternative reduces that reluctance.
I wonder how easily could you port celld to Node.js?
Acquihire - they’re acquiring it for the team behind it to eventually develop proprietary software
> develop proprietary software
This is a weird strategy to stake future IP value on in the age of AI. With competent and fully qualified team, anyone should be able to reverse engineer this idea and build a roadmap for their own implementation. Especially in the world of open source.
1. They can gain at least a temporary advantage by using a proprietary version. They'll have the original devs who can continue where they were before. 2. I wouldn't be surprised if we end up with a situation where LLM-based copyright laundering becomes illegal/enforced, but only in favor of large corporations' copyright, in which case they could maintain the advantage
What would they miss out on? A bunch of PRslop? The "open source community" is now dead.
Do you really think someone off the street, armed with Opus 5.5 could recreate Deno? Or would you pull Cloudflare people off what they were doing (meaning it's a very inefficient company) to work on this?
At the end of the day, great engineers armed with great tools are going to outperform anyone who just has the great tools.
Hopefully not to stop celld, the cloudflare Durable Object compatible impl. https://github.com/denoland/celld https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49185430
Phrased as it being merged into the existing, but I can't help but fret a bit. Is cloudflare willing to let their own core compute product be something available to the world? Absolutely sick wins if so. But I worry celld pretty reasonably seen as a threat.
read the Cloudflare post, basically the opposite of that: https://blog.cloudflare.com/deno-joins-cloudflare/
acqui-hire
The CloudFlare blog concludes with:
"By bringing celld and workerd together, we want it to be radically easy to build and operate distributed applications on your own infrastructure."
It does not appear they are close sourcing it. He mentions workerd is open source. Roadmap needs better communication but it appears people will be able to switch to new merged OSS version. It's just not well defined what it looks like yet.
We don't completely know what it will look like yet either, but it will absolutely be open source -- as workerd and celld are both already.
I'm happy that the Deno team found a suitable home. Cloudflare is likely the best place for them to land. I believe they will do great things together. However, I'm a bit concerned that there are very few independent Node.js runtimes: Anthropic acquired Bun, and now Deno will not be developed further.
Somehow I don't believe that Cloudflare doubling down on their own runtime -workerd, which will be likely migrated to Rust soon [1]- is the right choice (since it push on semantics that can only be run on Cloudflare infrastructure). I strongly believe Node.js semantics are likely the right ones for agents.
If anyone is looking for a full-open source alternative to Node.js that can run everywhere (browsers, phones or servers), please be aware that you can rely and use Edge.js [2] (disclaimer: Edge.js is part of the company that I founded: Wasmer)
[1] https://x.com/KentonVarda/status/2108559594691690663
[2] https://edgejs.org/
> since it push on semantics that can only be run on Cloudflare infrastructure
No, workerd and its semantics are not exclusive to Cloudflare infrastructure. People really do run it in production without using Cloudflare at all (I really wish I was allowed to say who because one of the users is hilariously ironic...).
Ryan's and Bert's core focus at Cloudflare is going to be making the self-hosting story better.
This was emphasized in the blog post: https://blog.cloudflare.com/deno-joins-cloudflare/
Thanks for chiming in Kenton.
> workerd and its semantics are not exclusive to Cloudflare infrastructure
I believe they are. You may be able to run workerd, but you can't run D1 (Sqlite alternative), you can't run KV or Queues (please correct me if I'm wrong).
All those are primitives that already exist in the non CF world: KV can be easily redis/memcached. Queues, Kafka and so on. I believe that a system that reuses those would be stronger.
> I really wish I was allowed to say who because one of the users is hilariously ironic
Ok, this peaked my curiosity. Would be great if you could share it!
> You may be able to run workerd, but you can't run D1 (Sqlite alternative), you can't run KV or Queues (please correct me if I'm wrong).
Details remain to be worked out, but part of the goal of the project is to make all these interfaces plugable with reference implementations that can sit on common infrastructure.
In fact, celld has already done a lot of this.
> Ok, this peaked my curiosity. Would be great if you could share it!
You'll have to find me in person over drinks somehow. ;)
Is it the triangle ?
> now Deno will not be developed further.
that's an interesting reflection on the nature of open source - in theory the source is there and "the community" could conceivably continue development. especially in the case of something like deno where the people most motivated to keep it alive are already programmers. but the reality is that however distributed an open source project is in theory, in practice it needs a single entity to steward it, otherwise it will die.
hopefully that single entity can be a consortium of companies invested in using the runtime, sort of like opentofu recently.
From a quick search, it looks like they raised $21 million in funding half a decade ago (after an earlier seed round), so this seems less like a reflection on the nature of open source in general and more just a reflection of this one project. It was set up in a way where development was happening because people were being paid to do it, and this time next year, they won't be. Maybe the community would have come in to try to keep it going if there wasn't any funding, or maybe it would have just stopped seeing any real development, but we can't really say for sure either way.
the $21M was presumably not just to develop deno but to build a business around it, which is a much harder problem. this feels like more of a bystander effect problem; if as few as three large companies that benefited from deno were willing to form an "openedeno" foundation and assign one full time employee each to it i'm betting that would be enough to at least sustain the project in a usable state, but of course everyone is hoping someone else will do it.
> consortium of companies invested in using the runtime
I believe this is very unlikely to happen. If the founder (Ryan) was involved in it or it have strong market position, it would have strong chances.
Now, is a kingdom without a king and without strong companies to steward it forward. I hope to be wrong though!
Maybe in another decade he'll pop up again with a third runtime called something like "Edno" that tries to do things differently than both Node and Deno. There are plenty of permutations of those letters left!
Dumb question: Why do we need many independent Node.js runtimes?
We need them so you can pick and choose the one that works best for your current project.
But that points to an important aspect of the platforms-game: The interface between the runtime and everything else should be standardized, to support true pick-and-choose.
I believe it indicates a healthy market and pushes competition and better outcomes for customers. In this case, Deno pushed Web primitives for Node.js and Bun pushed forward on speed (and helped Node.js work on their numbers better).
This have a similar analogy with browsers. Back then when Internet Explorer was the only supported browser, the websites were not evolving as fast. When Firefox pushed it forward and then Chrome, customers won (better and faster sites).
Well it keeps all the node developers away from my shit so I'm happy :)
Why Edge of Node.js?
Genuine question, is this legal under US anti-monipoly laws?
I don't really know anything about that area, but didn't Facebook get in some trouble for purchasing Instagram in part due to them being competition.
Surely buying a company out only to close their main offering is defined as anti-competitive?
US level anti-trust laws don't touch on a lot of anti-competitive behavior, mostly specifically it almost solely concerns just trusts and monopolies. I don't think I've heard of a court case ever before simply on the death of a product.
But also US anti-trust laws at the federal level have always relied on a strong FCC, FTC, and US Attorney General's Office to execute, all of which are currently neutered and/or understaffed under the current administration (and may take years to recover even in the best case scenarios). The US has decided it is a season for trusts and monopolies.
(See the mergers of Paramount and WB into Skydance consolidating 200+ combined years of movie history into a single monopoly under the Oracle nepobaby and almost directly undoing/mocking one of the largest and oldest anti-trust cases which was US v. Paramount Studios which set precedents for how large a movie studio could grow that lasted almost 100 years.)
(There might be something the state of California could do, but I don't know how much they want to get involved.)
US v. Paramount separated movie studios from movie theaters.
Sumner Redstone came from a movie theater family and formed modern Paramount by buying Viacom (which was spun out of CBS due to antitrust), Paramount, and then later CBS itself. He was able to buy Paramount as a cinema owner because the government abandoned the rule that you couldn't own both the studio and the theater in the 80s.
The corporate history of Hollywood is long and complicated. Skydance is obviously a big topic this month, but Paramount was owned by the Redstone family's National Amusements theater for as long as many of the adults on this site have been alive.
National Amusements wasn't considered an official breach of the Paramount decree because it was "the other around", a theater chain owning a studio rather than a studio owning the theaters. It also got a lot of weird exceptions because National Amusements was entirely private at the time.
But the current issue is right now streaming services dwarf theaters today. The Paramount decree was officially suspended by this administration and its courts on this matter stating it isn't a monopolistic oversight for studios to own and entirely control their streaming services (despite doing the exact same things with "originals" and "exclusives" that led to the original Paramount decree). This administration and its courts not only said the current streaming situation is fine, but that it also means the original Paramount decree no longer applies and studios may own theater chains again, because theaters now compete with streaming.
Skydance having both Paramount+ and HBO Max gives them a huge amount of leverage in the streaming space that is going to get stranger with this consolidation, and gets back to why that 200+ years of combined film history is important and relevant.
California has chosen not to get involved - they threatened to then backed down.
I'm not sure if it is legal or not, but it happens all the time, and nothing is done about it.
IMHO, it shouldn't be allowed.
Do you think Deno was real competition for Cloudflare, and now that they've merged we don't have alternative options for goods/services that are mostly essential?
I think if Cloudflare and Google merged, it still wouldn't be a monopoly because of AWS (and many others).
> but didn't Facebook get in some trouble for purchasing Instagram
They got scrutiny over it, sure. But trouble? No, I would say that they did not get into trouble.
In what sense did deno compete with cloudflare? It is a niche runtime and cloudflare is a cloud platform
Workers against Deno Deploy? And even if you don't count Deno as a whole in the same market as Cloudflare it's still shady as hell. They had plans to buy out a company with the explicit intent to shut down their main product.
You would expect them to integrate Deno with Workers, make a new official managed service that would probably become profitable in no time with Cloudflare's cost optimized infra, or at least commit to basic security fixes until the community finds new maintainers.
What they pulled off instead is the most toxic form of acqui hire ever invented.
> They had plans to buy out a company with the explicit intent to shut down their main product.
I understand why it looks that way, and we knew it would be hard to combat this perception.
But it's simply not true.
The actual story is simply this: The Deno team made a strategic decision to refocus on celld, and we (Cloudflare) are excited to support this work, for the reasons I explained in the blog post: https://blog.cloudflare.com/deno-joins-cloudflare/
See Ryan's own comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50023277
The fate of many forks, while reference implementation keeps chugging along adopting the most relevant features.
Deno is decidedly not a fork for Node.
Did they replace V8? Nope.
Is Node a fork of Chrome? They didn't replace V8 either.
It is Chrome on the backend, so yeah, kind of.
Thats really upsetting ngl.
Damn that sucks. I love Deno. It really should have ‘won’ the runtime race. Oh well.
Interesting. I guess open source is not as dependable as it used to be
I missed this when I skimmed the post. Sad stuff. I'm a big fan of deno.
Fuck me! We’re going to have to start our migration as soon as possible. I knew we were in a precarious spot after the layoffs, but this is a truly sad outcome.
i guess bun won
Hmm ... so why would they acquire it to let it die?
Classic acquihire? They allow customers to run javascript in their end nodes, surely the competence is useful.
Competitors use it as their serverless JS runtime, likely as simple as that.
Isn't that underselling the opportunity?
I'm sure they'll have a migration path to the cloudflare platform in 12 month.
I'm saddened by this, and will now need to plan for some migration work in a couple of production projects. Sigh.
Shame- it is my favorite Markdown formatter.
I mean we already have a winner (Bun) and it just means that Deno has admitted defeat.
From what is likely going to happen is that Deno will be donated to the Linux Foundation to avoid this.
Bun admitted defeat and sold themselves even before Deno. Node.js is and always was the winner.
Bun being acquired was not an admission of defeat. They are still actively developing.
Kinda feels like a rug pull, similar to Bun.
Not even close as Bun is still being actively developed, albeit with less fervor.
Which any existing user can just do?
I'm so bummed about this. Deno is by far my favourite JS runtime. I could sense this coming for a while now, but I was hopeful and just waiting to see what happened. Here we are. I'm glad I don't need to get off the runtime immediately. Sad we won't see any innovation like we did in the last 8 years or so.
I hope workerd at least adopts Deno's security mechanisms so it functions as a better sandbox.
One of my favourite projects of 2026 was a configurable LLM harness built around using deno as the runtime. The idea is that the configuration builds a state machine-driven program which is bundled into a binary that can only provide access to the I/O your code explicitly needs. I used it primarily to build interactive programs for colleagues which allow some LLM magic to occur without needing to worry about what they would do with Claude Desktop handling the same data or accessing the same machines and so on. It also allowed for testing local LLMs in deterministic patterns. How do they reason about what to do next when they can evaluate the possible states they can enter, based on the current context? It was really fun. Now I don't really know how I'd rebuild it, knowing I wouldn't use Deno. Maybe that's worth learning anyway.
I loved early Deno and am sad to see it die. I invested heavily in the Deno ecosystem because of Ry’s initial vision for it.
But I stopped because I saw this coming the moment they changed course and started putting npm compatibility as a priority. Deno’s surface area went from beautifully simple to very bloated. I think they felt the pressure of VC funding and just gave up on rebuilding Node from first principles.
The silver lining is that early Deno was so good that Node copied some of its features. So at least we have a better Node now.
Bun's adoption rate (because of its NPM compatibility) was the forcing function; not VC funding. Deno could pursue a slow-and-steady better-will-win approach vs. Node until another runtime competitor appeared with a more seamless node integration. In fact, the VC funding is what made the slow-but-steady strategy possible in the first place.
Strong disagree. Deno could have been a cheaply run open source project with corporate sponsors and could have pursued the slow and steady approach. There's no reason to feel pressure from competitors unless you want to if you're forging a genuinely new path. "Clean break from Node" was the differentiator. Once they abandoned that the reason for using it went away.
The moment they took on VC funding they had to care about competitors and also had to move away from the framework to things like Deno Deploy in pursuit of money.
I doubt deno could have funded its development purely from sponsorship. And Deploy generated real revenue (on its OEM/b2b side).
Jt is interesting to speculate on what might have been had Deno never been a profit-seeking company. But having worked there, I am reasonably confident in my assessment above.
I agree that should it need to be profit making then what’s e got makes sense. But hey, Node isn’t a profit making enterprise. Deno could have been the same.
I only tangentially followed Deno, but am a proud Deno 1 hoodie-haver!
A compatibility shim sounds like a great community run project while the core team could work on the slow-but-steady w/o concerning the core with too much burden of node compat.
Deno is now a feedstock for future JS runtimes.
They basically gave up the day they decided to become npm compatible. That was the day Deno died.
That’s the day I switched to Bun
Yet Bun has Node compatibility.
Probably because node imcompat / fresh start wasn't the only key differentiator for them?? Bun also had/has (in context of a leg up over node and similar to deno):
- typescript support - built in linting - built in package manager command - built in transpiler/bundler
Presumably they like other aspects of Bun, in a world where a clean API is not an option.
Enshittification is inevitable once a company takes VC funding
"Deno development effectively shut down via a Cloudflare acquihire" would be a better headline.
I'm trying to understand this. Cloudflare wants the people to work on different priorities or cloudflare wants deno to die?
In the case of the latter, I'm wondering why. Most of cloudflares architecture like workers support js runtimes so wouldnt investment into deno be more strategic than other priorities
I'm more thinking of "Deno (the company) lost interest/faith in Deno (the runtime), so they were looking for an out". They like working with runtimes, so Cloudflare is probably a good choice.
I guess this is why so much core staff left suddenly some months ago.
It’s likely that this could be true but they simply have something else they want the acquihired to work on and feel Deno would be a distraction. At least they’re being honest with it instead of letting development stall and all the ill will that comes with the usual slow death by acquisition
Brilliant take, this is why I come here. Cut through the "our amazing journey" BS.
So the developer tooling consolidation/acquisitions continue... hmm!
- Cursor -> SpaceX
- Astral/uv -> OpenAI
- Stainless -> Anthropic
- Bun -> Anthropic
- Astro.js -> Cloudflare
- Deno -> Cloudflare
- VoidZero (Vite, etc.) -> Cloudflare
- NuxtLabs -> Vercel
- Hugging Face -> NVIDIA
- ... what else?
Shopify bought Remix and Tailwind and hired the maintainer of Preact
Scala -> Vertiseit AB this year, I was going to joke about someone acquiring Scala but found out it really happened
GitHub -> Microsoft, or is this too old
Didn't we use to say that the startup exit strategy was to sell to Yahoo. I guess now a days it is sell to AI
- Warp -> OpenAI
replit is NOT aquired.
- Marimo -> CoreWeave
- Continue -> Cursor (xAI)
Yes open source tooling is gulped by AI companies.
Replit is not acquired by Anthropic
Good catch, no idea why I thought so. I edited that mistake thanks.
Svelte -> Vercel
Dioxus -> Cognition
BetterAuth -> Vercel
TanStack next?
RIP, my favorite JavaScript runtime, and thank you. You were too secure for this world.
What kind of business move is this for Cloudflare? celld is a more complete Cloudflare-at-home runtime than current workerd. What does Cloudflare stand to gain from commodizing Workers?
I'll say that although I'm not really a Cloudflare Workers user, I've been eyeing workerd and celld with interest. The idea of a complete backend in a box appeals to me (see also: PocketBase, Algernon). At the same time, the acquisition means that another company won't acquire Deno for celld.
From the Cloudflare blog post, this quote from Kenton Varda (head of Workers):
> "Lock-in" actually hurts us — that's why we went open source If there were truly no escape hatch from Workers, then some of our largest customers would never have signed on with us in the first place.
> [...]
> Ryan and Bert will be leading a new effort to make workerd self-hosting a first-class supported way to build and run apps using the Workers programming model. This will involve merging code and ideas from celld back into workerd. I'm incredibly excited for this work — I will personally be using it to host an instance of Cloudflare OS in my home.
Love the transition from being secure on my machine to being secure on somebody else's machine. This offers additional security by making it impossible for me to move the code anywhere else. Which solves the common security problem of me moving my business anywhere else.
To kill celld and potential competitor early? AFAIK, there is no a single Durable Objects alternative at the moment? It's better that way I guess.
> there is no a single Durable Objects alternative at the moment
If you live in Elixir land, there's this repo from the Phoenix team, which is quite good. It has pluggable storage, and EKV (https://github.com/chrismccord/ekv) is supported as "batteries include" type storage adapter.
https://github.com/phoenixframework/durable_server
Celld seems great, did not even know!
There is rivet and terse
https://github.com/elyase/awesome-object-storage-native#stat...
Meaning better that there is no alternative?
Rivet
I wouldn’t have imagined cloudflare acquiring Deno. But AI got into both of them and somehow now it makes sense? It’s wild. Anyhow congrats to Deno team.
A lot of the comments are on sunsetting Deno, but the more interesting part is merging the celld model into workerd.
I've been following celld since it was announced. Bootstrapping both durability and coordination off object storage simplifies so many things for self-hosting. (Yes, ironic that self-hosting has a cloud dependency, but in this case I think justified because S3 has become a widely supported protocol that you can run yourself too).
Will be curious to see the details on exactly how that model makes it into workerd.
The plan is to bring the celld model to workerd: run a fleet of workerd instances that use a bucket for coordination and storage. Building on workerd, instead of a separate runtime means our effort isn't split and that APIs are exactly the same in both CF and self-hosted. And of course the deno team will help improve the worker runtime itself.
>A lot of the comments are on sunsetting Deno, but the more interesting part is merging the celld model into workerd.
I think people are focusing on it because if you've built your business on Deno, then the "Deno will have no support in 13 months time" is a bit of an existential risk, and will be a huge time-sink for your team. So it's far more interesting to most of the people reading this page on HN, because HN is full of people who are first-adopters.
Maybe it’s time to ask AI to rewrite those projects ;)
check rivet and terse
https://github.com/elyase/awesome-object-storage-native#stat...
I feel it leaves a bitter flavor how Ryan Dahl pushed so hard for Deno and Deno Deploy for years, just to let them die within 1 year and 6 months respectively. Thankfully I don't have any codebases that heavily use Deno features, otherwise this would be a steep curve now.
Don’t have a strong opinion on any of this, but it’s actually super normal for anyone who helps run a business to push hard and try to grow it.
Things don’t always shake out as you plan
Investors are a helluva drug
Yeah they just made me migrate my blog to their new cloud platform four months ago.
Meh, those types of large scale migrations are just a very short prompt nowadays.
specially deno to bun
To summarize my feelings: Shit!
Deno's ability to import directly from a package registry or even git repo in a standalone TS script without requiring a package.json or similar 'meta-data' file was actually really nice for shell scripting stuff. AFAIK node.js still can't do anything similar?
`zx --install` will give you this. It's quite handy and enjoyable generally for shell scripting in ts/js. https://google.github.io/zx/cli#install
if you're not locked to javascript you could use python with pep-723[1] to declare inline dependencies
1: https://peps.python.org/pep-0723/
I just migrated that project away from Python to TS :D (cries in corner).
I’m happy if this means Deno is able to get a second impulse. I use Deno daily and while it’s true that it’s in this weird position where it’s not sexy like bun or enterprise-y like node, it has a great developer experience. a no-surprises runtime that does a lot of interesting things the right way (like compile to desktop to a browser-less webgpu runtime), the vscode extension is flawless and overall the perfect balance of batteries included without bloat.
of course i’m only talking about deno, the technology not deno, the cloud service.
> I’m happy if this means Deno is able to get a second impulse
Bad news, sorry, the article says:
> We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime.
Sounds like Celld will live on within workerd, Deno is over.
> I’m happy if this means Deno is able to get a second impulse.
From TFA: We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime.
read the blogpost, they are discontinuing deno after 1 year
The fact that Deno development is being suspended doesn't mean the community can't step in. The Deno runtime is licensed under MIT. Such forks might be impulse to grow even further.
Or, we can also speculate that after one year, Cloudflare will create an internal Deno fork and will continue to reap the benefits and improvements.
Again, thanks to the MIT license.
People always say this but it's always an extreme mixed bag where most developers/maintainers just move on.
it’s open source. i’m hoping it gets picked up by the community. maybe i’m just too hopeful
The majority of the last year's development has been via LLM. I don't think anyone is going to want to fork that when they can just tell an LLM to do whatever and get the same result
The Cloudflare side is also worth a read: https://blog.cloudflare.com/deno-joins-cloudflare/
Deno should never have been a business - there's no business model.
And worse for Deno - nodejs may not be great but it's good enough.
And may you never have an incumbent competitor that is is "good enough" - it will be your downfall.
Damn. Deno is a super old project, in 2018 the Nodejs creator did the talk "things I hate about NodeJS" and introduced Deno. It's 8 years ago now, and clearly even though the project was known by most Node users, it didn't gain any traction at all. I don't even remember "the bad parts" that Deno tries to solve, were they that bad at all ? Anyways Node will keep evolving and implement new features, new standards, optimization. I think it's super risky to move to an alternative. In the age of the LLMs, if you wanna get out of Node, you better translate all to native Go or Rust.
8 years is not super old, or even old. It's important to understand software maturity cycles for core components.
"old" is relative term. Given @TheRogue's account is 4 years old, maybe new to field. If so, it feels "old".
I understand your sentiment of justifying not being "old". but you gotta bring up "legacy code".
"Working Effectively with Legacy Code" defines legacy code as code without tests thus hard to change it easily or with confidence.
So either @TheGuardian is discussing about the age of software relative to his/her perspective or confused "legacy code" without understanding deno code base.
If 8 years is "super old" in terms of software, what is Windows? Or Emacs? Or old Fortran software from the 50s in the Voyager software?
Define "super old" or just "old".
It's relative measurement. When you are 9th grader, even a freshman college student feels way older.
But as you are in your 30s, you feel less of difference.
Same thing here, How do you define Windows and Emacs being "old"? For those who's been using it for decades, not as old as Voyager software. For those who lived through those times, Windows and Emacs feels younger.
See where I am going with it?
---
If you have a nephew or a kid, they will say you are "old". But your parents will consider you "young" for the rest of their lives.
In the context of software, I think "how old is old" depends on how web based the software has been over its lifetime.
I think 8 years is old for software that has heavily Web based like Deno. But Windows and Emacs have had portions of their lifetime without the Web in a meaningful way, so 8 years would be young.
ty. I like this over others as it uses the "web" as the basis for relativity.
Ancient
> "Working Effectively with Legacy Code" defines legacy code as code without tests thus hard to change it easily or with confidence.
This is not a universally accepted definition. I've owned plenty of services with 95%+ unit test coverage, massive integ test suites, and synthetic canary tests that ran every minute that I would consider legacy. Plenty of AI slop today gets barfed out with 100% test coverage, but much of it is legacy from day 1.
I aggree thre are many defs. I only used that ex as it's easy to use and understand.
What would you consider legacy? (not trynna fight, just wondering what you consider as one)
Workloads that either are superseded or there is a desire to supersede them. It's not just old deprecated stuff, but also stuff that people want to deprecate.
An example could be old API endpoints only hit by old versions of a mobile app where users may be slow to update. Or a case where only newer clients/instances support modern features and old ones are stuck on a frozen featureset until they cutover.
But active services with no immediately existant alternative may also be legacy. If your auth is behind a disappointing managed service like AWS Cognito, you may consider your entire auth stack legacy while the replacement is still looming in the roadmap down the line. Maybe you can't justify funding to work on a transition just yet, but you already would avoid building on top of the existing tech stack.
It may not be old, but it sure hasn’t caught on much after 8 years. I did remember a lot of posts about migrating cloud functions/lambdas to deno initially, but not much since.
I’m taking the stance that no news is bad news here. If it was good, people would be doing Resume Driven Dev with deno and we would be buried in those articles. Alas.
Also it didn't hit 1.0 until 2020 so it's more accurate to say it's 6 years old.
It's not that old, but it's old enough that it should have gained a bit of traction, it should have been mentioned in more discussions etc. And ultimately adopted more. It's purely a gut feeling though because I didn't run any numbers
> I don't even remember "the bad parts" that Deno tries to solve, were they that bad at all ?
Well node and bun sought to solve the same problems after Deno demonstrated a path. They got to learn from Deno's mistakes as well.
To me Deno died the day it decided to not support npm packages and died again when it started supporting it.
Ironically the reason why I hated it when it was introduced was the reason why they added support for npm (i.e. absolute URLs don't support semver and therefore you will load multiple versions)
In what way does supporting npm packages compromise Deno's design? I don't know a lot about Deno but thought it was more about rewriting in Rust, more batteries included like native TS support, and more secure defaults.
Once Deno's direction became clear, success seemed unlikely.
Really sad to see this. I've built projects on the Deno runtime and to see it end in 45 words...
I guess the positive is that at least Deno pushed Node.js to evolve.
Insane, I'm deeply saddened and embittered, I don't want to go back to NodeJS and I don't find any advantage in Bun. I guess this is my sign to just get off of JavaScript entirely.
Whatever allows you to make stuff is good enough.
you are definitely right, thank you for this reminder, it's just that I'm a bit tired of managing trash like NodeJS
Congrats on the exit :)
Finally, the next step of forking Node is up for grabs:
Node > Deno > Done (anyone?)
Oned maybe.
And then Danone.
This one might have to be spooned
Sounds like something Bending Spoons would like
I have 2 questions:
- there are companies offering serverless functions on their platforms, powered by Deno Deploy. Can this acquisition be an attempt to kill competition?
- Cloudflare now owns a huge chunck of JavaScript ecosystem, like Vercel. They are buying like countries that are arming themselves for war. What is the strategy here?
This might not be seen in much favourable light by many but IMO Cloudflare has the most elegant serveless PaaS as I have seen to date.
The design and architecture is extremely minimal to the point that all of it can be explained on a single A4 page with a 14pt font including D1 + Durable objects. And I hope that it stays that way.
It has all the primitives that you can wish for to build a software system on top of it be it queues, long running jobs, workflows, pipelines, email handlers, cron jobs and even built in AI models ready for you to be invoked.
ATM - it is extremely cheap, reliable, simpler and more capable than anything out there. Deno itself had very little scope anyway because almost no developer tooling is sellable in this environment even more so post AI. Therefore, it is going to accelerate the Cloudflare platform to be the best in class and hopefully not complex and bloated.
I think the biggest thing Cloudflare needs to buy is some sort of Postgres-database service. They've already cornered the market for everything front-end/serverless
Cloudflare could make the biggest impact by doing something similar to AWS DSQL. There are very few options in the multi-region replicated space, and it ties in nicely with their edge workers.
D1 is their bet there but considering hyperdrive, a real Postgres would be cool.
I also wish they expanded jurisdiction more. I worked at companies that couldn't use Cloudflare because of specific location requirements in contracts
D1 is a very different product. D1 is designed to be tenant sharded for any real workloads.
If they bought Neon that'd be a coup.
PlanetScale might be more likely as Neon was bought by Databricks.
Yeah. D1 is nice and easy but a serverless postgres offering would make a significant difference.
Planetscale?
I wonder how this will affect Bunny's competitor to Cloudflare Workers, Edge Scripting [1] -- which runs on Deno.
[1] https://bunny.net/docs/scripting/
I'm very sad Deno is going away, even though I've never used it nor did I plan to use it.
It is a bit hypocritical in a sense. Similar to how I was sad that a local restaurant recently closed down. In the past two years I went there maybe three times total. But I just liked having it there as an option.
Deno had a ton of good ideas but I just never felt confident that it would have the lasting power. Some of the early decisions, like their initial refusal to fully support package.json and the npm eco-system, made me unsure of their suitability as the basis for a business.
But I always wanted them to succeed. In the same way I always wanted Heroku to succeed even though I never used their service.
More options are better. But I guess "use it or lose it" applies. Did I dodge a bullet or contribute to the downfall?
I'm very surprised they are not running with the runtime. That seemed like Deno's secret sauce? The rest of it is very aligned with Cloudflare already, deploy, kv, workers, etc seems like the lower hanging fruit.
It's almost certainly not worth it. Having less software that you can keep more reliable is almost always worth it over having more software just because it's 10% faster or whatever. This isn't always true but it's mostly true.
It seems VC money is not really compatible with open source
Maybe they all learned their lesson from Docker giving away the entire product for free
It's very sad. I was excited about Deno from day one, and I wanted to see it succeed.
Deno's ability to run TypeScript files - stripping types - was arguably implemented in Node because of Deno. The consolidated tooling approach was a good attempt at solving tooling fragmentation that Node suffers from.
I think for Deno to succeed, it would've had to have been under a non-profit and maybe that can still happen.
It would certainly be nice if someone continued the work. But I wouldn’t hold my breath for it. Seems like an unthankful job (although I’m sure many projects using Demo now would be happy if it’s still supported, at least).
RIP Deno. Goes into the bin, after Bun.
I was rooting for Deno so much as I was fighting with node for years. Luckily I made full transition from JS last year and not comming back.
What did you transition to?
AI.
All of this just re-informed my believe to stay with true and tested systems that have survived decades. C if I fell confident and Common Lisp otherwise. Both standardized, have been around for ages, and they don’t disappoint.
I feel bad for anyone that now relies on Deno. And as good as Cloudflare might be for some things, I also feel bad for anyone relying on them.
I just learned of Deno yesterday when setting up some software for the first time. I wonder how many applications depend on it behind the scenes?
Node always felt so annoying to deal with. I was really excited when Bun and Deno were coming up. Pour one out.
This is a real bummer. Work never adopted Deno but I love their model, security posture, and the standard library. I've been less interested in typescript recently, but it has turned into the default for frontend.
On the plus side, cloudflare will get access to some fantastic talent, who can hopefully put their effort into building a better web.
We’re in an interesting time for developer tooling. It’s easier than it’s ever been to develop new tools, but harder to monetize or maintain them. We need to figure out what sustainable OSS looks like in the AI age.
Didn’t they have a flashy lawsuit to free the JavaScript trademark? What happens to that now?
No indication cloudflare would pursue that yet that I see.
It looks like, after Oracle kept on pushing out the deadline for a certain step in the suit process, the parties are in settlement negotiations now [0]; the motion was granted [1], so we might see more info after October 28th.
[0] https://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=92086835&pty=CAN&eno... [1] https://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=92086835&pty=CAN&eno...
Pretty sure that was just for marketing.
If this was done to kill celld as a runtime that would be unfortunate.
edit: my reaction was too soon, it seems like they will be explicitly working on making workerd an open source self hostable runtime
On the contrary. Please read my part of Cloudflare's blog post here: https://blog.cloudflare.com/deno-joins-cloudflare/
I'm really happy to hear this. Congrats to everyone involved.
Sounds like the opposite: They are killing Deno to work on celld
Last year it was bun, and now it is - Deno!
What's happening to JS platforms? I thought Deno has a much better approach to building a platform.
> What's happening to JS platforms?
They took on VC funding.
People need to eat and pay rent. Can’t survive on just goodwill.
https://theoatmeal.com/comics/exposure
This shows that there was no money to be made in their business model and they had to sell to make up for the years or losses accumulated.
Does anyone know how many paying Deploy customers there were? The post only offers migration help to paying customers and gives them six months, which makes me think the number is small enough to hand-hold. Millions of runtime downloads and a few hundred accounts on a paid plan can both be true, and only the second one pays for a team.
Remember "choose boring technology"?
I had to evaluate Deno vs. Bun vs. Node for a project two years ago, and chose Node. I think Deno has good ideas but often times these projects cannot reach escape velocity, especially when they're constrained by VC motives.
I still remember this cute drawing from years ago outlining the things Ryan regret about Node
https://imgur.com/a/XFAMzOV
Man the "cute girly sketchbook doodle summarizing a programming thing" is a throwback to a bygone era. I saw that and immediately knew "this is from the late 2010s"
I remember early into my first programming job as an intern in 2017 someone shared a very similar looking series of sketches intended to explain git with cats. I didn't understand it at the time, and then years later when I was much more comfortable with git I took a look at it again and the explanations make just as little sense to me now as it did then.
Genuine question. Why are companies buying our runtimes ? What is the advantage ? Maintaining open source and having more adoption in specific softwares like runtimes and programming languages helps keep software more robust and reliable right ? Am I getting something wrong.
In this specific case, it's probably just aqui-hiring. There's a ton of incredible talent at Deno and Cloudflare can pay them a lot more
Also Deno was starting to try to increase revenue with stuff like Deno Deploy. If Deno did succeed, they would be a direct competitor with Cloudflare Workers
With Bun I think it was basically a marketing ploy. To show that it can be developed by AI and still useful
> With Bun I think it was basically a marketing ploy.
I don't know, the vast majority of daily Microsoft Defender offenders I have to wade through, as well as the majority of the intune remidy requests are related to Node being used in various Microsoft applications. The Azure CLI is one of them, but the one which really ranks high on the security risk levels is always something "Agent" or "AI" related folder which I assume are what runs the Copilot and Cowork clients.
I think I had around 800 CVE warnings in relations to Axios in side a Microsoft tool related to AI running node this week, from just 8 devices.
Bun having it's own batteries included is probably a nice benefit to avoid that.
I think in a case like Bun they're also potentially buying the pre-built goodwill associated with the project.
I there was also an acquihire component to bun as well.
In this case, they're explicitly not buying the runtime. They're killing the runtime.
I was a big fan of deno, so much that I migrated all my cf worker to demo, cause you can run the same engine in there cloud and local/selfhost - perfect no vender lockin(like with cloud flare workers), it's so sad to see it gets shelved.
A bit worried what will become of https://github.com/denoland/rusty_v8 as it still is the best maintained (?) and featured binding of V8 for rust.
rusty_v8 isn't going anywhere - we'll keep maintaining it and will be working towards integrating it into workerd
Awesome, thanks for the reply!
"entire Deno team is joining Cloudflare .."
Whom did they work for before?
If your company does not own an ecmascript runtime ngmi
So is dead for all intents and purposes. And this would’ve happened to Bun if it hadn’t found its killer app (Claude Code).
Another reason why standards matter. Think twice before you bet on that VC funded horse, folks.
Deno did bring lot of good ideas and hope some of them will flow into Node, especially full typescript type stripping, package less imports to name a few.
Also worth calling out that if you want to disrupt a major player, you need to be 10x better, not just 2x.
Either way, congrats team. Hope you going on to build something great at Cloudflare.
I'll sound smug saying it but this is always, always inevitable from the moment Deno took VC investment. Either it was going to be successful enough to take over everything (and it wasn't going to be) or it would end up acquired/shut down.
I know Node is boring but it's not going anywhere.
I’ve been using Deno’s permission system as a sandboxed replacement for ‘python -c’ for my agents. Hopefully a better supported runtime (in any language) adds a similar permissions system in the near future.
I have no idea anymore what is happening, and none of the blogposts seem to explain that either. So, if I am to start a new JS or TypeScript project or whatever, what should I choose and why? One runtime used a lot of tokens to rewrite Zig project, one was already Rust, one bought, one rewritten in Go, what is going on?
> what should I choose and why?
You should choose Node.js unless you have a good reason to use something else. This is what everyone uses, and it is used widely enough that it's in the same position as Java, i.e. it will be supported forever.
Also the other runtimes only offer incremental improvements.
Regarding the blogposts, you don't read a lot about Node.js because it is mature software and there isn't a lot of drama or new things to talk about.
One was not rewritten in Go. Typescript rewrote its compiler in Go, but that doesn't affect which runtime you use for the resulting Javascript code. Moreover this isn't producing a fork in Typescript as it is a replacement for the previous compiler, at least once they're done with it. The JS runtime forks and churn are not related to Typescript per se.
Yeah, after I posted I realized that Go remark was not correct, but again, I am confused how do you combine all that. JS I can read and understand (well, understand), I have seen it already, TS, I compile TS to JS right, and then I can choose any of the current available runtimes to run that code, correct? And final fat binary that is deployed has what, whatever runtime I choose to be? Huh, I think I guessed that right, I do use such apps, but never bothered to understand how they are actually packed.
> Typescript rewrote its compiler in Go, but that doesn't affect which runtime you use for the resulting Javascript code.
It unfortunately has other implications, ts-loader (used by webpack) for example is not compatible with the new Go crap so you need to do weird pinning down to v6 to get your builds working again [1].
[1] https://github.com/TypeStrong/ts-loader/issues/1671
Yes, everything I have is pinned that way too. That's why I said "when it is done", even in my limited experience and contact with TS it is not currently a suitable replacement, and I'm not a particularly hard user of the tool chain. (I am having a hard time phrasing this in a way that I'm completely sure can't be potentially read as snarky or short-tempered, so I guess I'll just go with the clumsy direct statement that I'm agreeing with you and continuing the thought from my own experience, not trying to disagree.)
As near as I can see, it isn't anything fundamental to the rewrite, it's just a transitional phase, though.
Well, that "Go crap" needs some explanation. The reason I am not involved in JS is because I mostly use Go for backend, and I am happy I have no relation with frontend at all. And even that is just small part of my job and what I do daily (Radius, Diameter, etc.). But, I never heard about Go crap (in that context maybe), or experienced any crap there, it is just nice and simple. What are the issues?
Many of the "rewrite it in Rust/Go/whatever fad" projects that have cropped up have been done with the assistance of AI, especially because both languages are a pretty heavy divergence if you're used to C, C++, Java or JavaScript.
And when you can't manage to coordinate with an ecosystem dependency as large as webpack before the migration to make sure nothing breaks... my suspicion is utter incompetence and gross misuse of AI.
There's basically no reason not to just go with Node as 99% of projects out there do
Isn’t the whole node npm ecosystem now with AI a greater risk as before?
"which runtime" is a separate discussion from "which package manager"; there's nothing in Node requiring you to use npm (or to rely on external dependencies at all)
I don't choose TS/JS for new projects anymore unless they're browser based. If you need to be in JS land for whatever reason, deploy with Node but do local package management/testing with Bun, because it's way faster for those and you can migrate off without too much pain if it ever becomes problematic.
More or less the same but I dropped Bun after Anthropic acquisition so I now default to PNPM and Vitest, which is ok.
While it may as well be the same thing, the Anthropic acquisition isn't what turned me off of Bun, it was the vibe-coded Rust refactor. As soon as that happened I dropped Bun. Deno was what I ended up more interested in (Deno Fresh seemed really cool too), but I guess it's just back to Node/PNPM for me now as well. What is going on anymore...
There's just one worthy of using for fresh project: Bun.
Deno was never going to be a thing anyways.
Bun's being a part of Anthropic is just as concerning, if not more so. At least Cloudflare is being honest here that they have no idea continuing Deno support long term. Anthropic's first role in Bun was treating it as a playground to migrate from Zig to Rust using as many LLM tokens as they wished in the process. That's not exactly the sign of a steward with long term maintenance in mind.
Bun's rewrite has been a massive success, unprecedented even.
The amount of new features they are coming up with, the speed of development has been even faster than before.
We have not seen any indications so far Anthropic messing with Bun's direction. It was always Jarred deciding what to do and it is still the same. So far Anthropic has left Bun alone and they are just reaping benefits of bun getting faster and faster.
I see that as a long term benefit. Not a negative.
Bun is dead. It's a skin-walker wearing the appearance of its former self. They screwed the community when they got acquired.
Deno has been successful, technically better and a respectably run project. I expect it may survive in the form of modular runtime and associated features.
Screwed who actually? How? Dead? lol.
Every company that is using Bun is getting so much more perf benefits — faster and less memory used; also less crashes/bugs. New features are dropping rapidly. All those naysayers about rust port will be littered with bugs and unmaintainable crap are already proven wrong. So now you just call it dead. nice.
Just use Node. Community led and supported by the Linux Foundation.
Why not the standard NodeJS? Well supported and not heavily influenced by acquisition or trends like bun is?
If Deno and Bun were not kicking NodeJS's behind, we'd not see any of the improvements in the ecosystem in last few years. Node has been stagnant for a long time.
> So, if I am to start a new JS or TypeScript project or whatever, what should I choose and why?
NodeJS for the runtime if it's not in a browser, webpack for bundling. For the frontend stack, either React if you're in for a full application or, fuck it, good old jQuery if you don't want to do type document.queryXXX all the time. You'll find a ton of developers and coding bootcamp graduates to deal with all of that, and the AI agents should all be trained well enough on them.
Everything else is just a recipe for getting rug-pulled or being the bananaware customer responsible for the ripening.
I'd throw out webpack and start with unbundled ESM today. Vendor bundle and spot bundle with esbuild or rollup or something else designed for native ESM bundling and just ESM bundling, and only where you see actual performance bottlenecks (visible request waterfalls). Use any friction you see as an excuse to replace/drop old CommonJS dependencies entirely.
Webpack had its day, but today its kitchen sink and incredibly baroque configurations are as much a liability as a helpful place to start on a project. Start fresh with ESM and without a bundler and things are surprisingly nice in development experience.
I'd just go with Node, it supports TS natively now.
NodeJS just strips TS types and prays that it runs as JS. It's not a native support by any means.
For example it doesn't support enums.
Bun and Deno do the real thing.
"deno run" also just strips the types. The type checker is 'opt-in' now.
Don't know what Bun does though.
> prays that it runs
If you want to use TS stripping for your own project the typescript ecosystem makes it very easy to avoid using the wrong features. Just set erasableSyntaxOnly and verbatimModuleSyntax to true in your tsconfig.json and you will be warned when you're doing something node would not be able to handle. These days I find more code is being written to be stripping friendly than not, the incompatible stuff is of little importance besides enum for which you could resort to an as const object or a string union. I consider the presence of such things a smell, the TS dev team considers things like enums to have been a mistake, the goal of TS is to remain minimally divergent with JS outside of the type annotations.
Oh for real? I thought the latest versions ran actual typescript.
Well, it does technically in that to "run TypeScript" all you have to do is strip the types, and execute the remaining JavaScript. This is what Node does, but it doesn't do any typechecking. You can always include TypeScript as a dependency to do the actual type checking for you.
Deno from my understanding included a version of the TypeScript compiler as part of its build. Node doesn't do this. I'm not sure what Bun does, but I wouldn't trust it for anything more than a hobby project.
This is sad. I was a heavy user of Deno, though I recognized its likely downfall when they laid off a large part of their team in the last year.
Well this sucks. My blog is based on deno as I wasn't a fan of node.js at the time. I guess I'm gonna have to rewrite my blog engine.
Wow, so React Native and Deno both effectively have nails in their coffins. I wonder what's next.
What happened to React Native? Is it going to be discontinued as well?? We have quite a few customers using it, so we provide a SDK for it. Could be interesting if we can retire that.
Well this is very stupid. Why not move Deno to be based on workerd or something? or vice versa? throwing it away is such a waste.
What is it with everyone buying runtimes? — P.S. Deno always felt like it is going to be abandoned, you can't build your work on this much shaky ground...
Does this mean that celld is dead? No more open source durable objects?
Well this is fucking depressing.
So what's the story with JSR sticking around then? Does it already see meaningful use among people using Workers, or do they just really want an escape hatch in case we see more long-term issues with GitHub and NPM?
And does it at least mean the stdlib will see continued development?
It probably does get that advantage that it has had fewer supply chain attacks than npm.
I liked its scoring system for packages and "make the Typescript docs a public part of the package page" and "focus entirely on ESM-first/ESM-only packages". None of that npm does today, so JSR is still the best way I know to find modern and up-to-date/clean packages versus npm just has a nasty swamp of things still in CommonJS for no reason or that will never get upgraded out of CommonJS because the original maintainers are long gone.
I personally see it as valuable for similar reasons -- plus the ability to just import via web if a package is compatible with browsers, and it being open source and free for the community to fork and rebuild in case something like this goes south.
JSR keeps running - the infrastructure is moving to CF
That I saw, I was more curious what motivated them to keep it
Inevitable for a project like this when you take VC money, unfortunately.
Does Cloudflare already use Deno under the hood then? Like the Anthropic -> Bun aquisition
This is mostly to be expected.
After Deno did layoffs we saw a consistent decline in announcements and innovation.
Sad day, but unsurprising.
Wow. Just about to choose Deno for something. That not only makes me rethink Deno but ... rethink a lot of things ...
Fools... I downloaded it for free...
10 things I regret about Deno talk incoming
my recent comment [0]: was deno was the only other tech player building a proper serverless platform to bring Cloudflare workers in an open source manner.
will they continue that work ?
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49977056
otherwise this is a proper acquisition. t
the CF blog post suggests that is what the Deno team will be working on: combining workerd and celld for true self hostable workers/DOs
Please be sure to read the post on Cloudflare's blog, it's not just fluff:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/deno-joins-cloudflare/
TL;DR: Ryan and co. will be merging celld with workerd to create one first-class open source self-hostable runtime for Workers and Durable Objects. In the post I explain in the post why, contrary to what you might think, this is good business for Cloudflare and we're very excited about it.
I do appreciate that it's not explicitly anti-competitive, but as a biochemist who spent a lot of time thinking about living systems, I am a bit concerned about a budding ecology that has perhaps collapsed <3
But I do have a strangely high trust in the individuals involved (you, Ryan, Sunil, others), even though I am a bit perplexed by CloudFlare's incentives or economics
Which is to say: I am choosing to be optimistic :)
Caveat, am commenting before reading, mind you -- just my general reaction to mergers in a world that never cleaves :)
EDIT: though this has also probably deflated a lot of the good-faith conversations I was having with gov-adjacent Europeans about celld being a boon for the moment of heightened European sovereignty, where EU data residency isn't necessarily considered enough distance anymore.
Who decided that the Deno runtime would be abandoned? Was this Cloudflare's or Deno's decision? And why?
It's a joint decision and I agree with it. I'm most invested in its success and have put the most work into it - and I no longer think it's where I can do the most important work. There are some good ideas in Deno and it's well engineered - but it ultimately is not solving big problems. It has been sucked into the gravity well of node compatibility, which forces it to behave exactly as Node does. Why reimplement Node? It works. Marginal performance or UX or security benefits are not enough.
I'm interested in building powerful new abstractions. celld has been working remarkably well, depending only on object storage for coordination and persistence. It is not just a slightly different API to interact with the file system or network - it's an entirely new model for server development. I wrote a bit about it here: https://x.com/rough__sea/status/2105853283617440032
We'll ship monthly releases for a year, and Deno stays MIT-licensed. If people want to carry it forward, I'd like that.
You still need a runtime for your CLIs though. How does local development work for celld and workerd? Are you moving back to Node for that?
Maybe helpful context: https://x.com/rough__sea/status/2105853283617440032
> once you see it, you'll realize there's no point to traditional javascript runtimes in serving applications - only for build processes (eg bundling) and scripting.
I suspect he's come to the conclusion that the runtimes are now just a commodified build system that's been dialed in already, and the layer where celld sits is where the next unvalidated opportunities are
I don’t know that many people reading this particular thread care whether this is a good business decision for Cloudflare.
Most of us are here because we’re curious what it means for Deno specifically and FOSS TypeScript runtimes in general, since Bun was also acquired.
This is actually awesome news believe it or not. I'm excited b/c i think there's a lot of potential in the world w/ deno's team being on solid footing w/ cloudflare.
I know the runtime is in trouble, but i'm not as worried tbh b/c the principles deno championed are going to keep going.
What ? They are literally stopping development in a year.
You think the open source community will be able to continue deno? Did you miss the part where they're stopping development on it?
anthropic + bun vs cloudflare + deno, could it be counter move for building from agent sandbox that runs on the edge?
Cloudflare really be buying up everything
Can we rename title to "Deno is winding down" ? It's not joining cloudflare. the people are
never used deno or paid much attention to it despite all the fancy marketing.
i always wondered how they were making money
No idea why CF wouldn't just have them to continue working on Deno indefinitely...
Because Deno turned into some quirky serverless technology.
CF has its own quirky serverless technology and has no interest in funding any competition, even/especially in such sad shape as Deno is
Deno is a excellent and quirky severless, server, CLI, library, and GUI technology.
CF workerd is only one out of those 5.
I mean, sure, but this doesn't preclude CF from keeping a few people around who can work on the runtime while everyone else does... whatever CF wants them to do.
They don't even need to be the long term stewards either. Spend some time setting up a proper governance structure for Deno, hand it off, and then pay some maintainers to continue their existing effort.
At least how it's stated in the post, it really feels like an "ah good luck everyone, I'm out!" sorta deal, which seriously sucks for everyone who really believed in Deno.
> We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime.
Extremely disappointing...
It's only OpenAI which doesn't have an in-house modern runtime
https://openai.com/index/openai-to-acquire-astral/
Is it JS?
They should just go all in with Wasm.
~/.local/bin/codex --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox -c 'model="internal-gpt-7-turbo-blackhole"' -c 'model_reasoning_effort="max"' -c 'plan_mode_reasoning_effort="max"'
create a plan to implement a javascript runtime similar to {deno,bun,node.js,whatever} in {Rust,C++,ASM,Go,Fortran} language, use subagents @ max effort, keep building until you're done, follow instructions according to INSTRUCTIONS.md
Wait a day and you're done.
Grats on the bag.
Disappointing news to see it shut down, but maybe the writing was on the wall after they laid off some of their folks.
I've been using deno for years and built some nontrivial services in it. When deno added support for npm packages, the early days were pretty rough. I ran into lots of issues with packages and spent a lot of time reading random github issue threads. It's been pretty smooth sailing for the last year or so though.
At least I can use ai to help migrate off of deno.
https://dbushell.com/2026/03/20/denos-decline-and-layoffs/
Gotta say the fate of Deno has been pretty disappointing I had high hopes for it
Can't believe they bought out Vite and now Deno. All our toolchains are getting bought out by military contractors
is this a good or a bad news ?
I’m disappointed that they discontinue the Deno runtime. It really is a joy to use.
I think they ran out of money and joining Cloudflare was their only remaining option.
Congrats to the team! Sad to see deno go away, it’s a really great tool
Man, this year has been nothing but bad news for me. This is disappointing, and really makes me question what is the point if even open source is now this easily enshittified or "killed by [insert big tech co here]." I've spent years now using Deno nearly exclusively for new projects, and saw it as the most sane JS server runtime. This also makes me hesitant to use anything with Ryan Dahl's name on it ever again.
This is awesome. The Cloudflare platform is great; being able to run more of it locally is a definite plus.
Deno was a good idea in the Old World of software development before LLMs, and simply doesn’t make sense anymore.
Why? We probably need more sandboxing, not less.
Especially with LLMs automating all sorts of code and operational aspects, we could do Tcl/Lua type whitelist sandboxes where the application can only call a limited set of functions.
I warn you to not try to argue with ai shilling people
I'll be fine, I outlasted the NoSQL and cryptocurrency people :-)
I think it makes more sense to use the kernel‘s’s sandboxing utilities (like seccomp, SELinux, namespaces, prctl and eBPF) than to rely on the process to try to isolate itself purely in userspace which will always have holes.
Damn that is a shame. I liked pretty much everything about Deno. Especially great for scripting.
I'll probably move to Rust for scripting I reckon. It's not very mature but hopefully it won't be too much longer.
Fresh was also the best web framework I've used. Oh well.
R.I.P.
Disappointing. Everything I want to express about this is impolite.
I guess I can say that this means Deno won't ever have a much needed Python 3 moment.
really wondering what role celld played in the negotiations
From CloudFlare's side (https://blog.cloudflare.com/deno-joins-cloudflare/) is seems celld was the main point of this - letting the Deno team focus on making workerd self-hosting easier.
i guess bun won?
Congrats. But also terrible news for the ecosystem; this project was a bit doomed from the start, and they acknowledge it multiple times (implicitly), but nice to have competition, I guess.
Ultimately I only trust Node.js to succeed. Bun being too deep into "shipping anything that increases usage".
Bun is claude code now. Not gonna touch it.
Deno was a nice alternative with easy configuration and I loved KV and running it on a VPS.
It's sad how it worked out. Bun really stole Deno's momentum. Deno's foundational trust model really feels like its what the JS community needs. There were so many genuine improvements over Node that I don't think Node can ever just adopt
And now if you heard it, Deno is dead. 1 more year of support and they all got hired to work at cloudflare instead
sorry, but who even is still working on Deno? All my friends who used to work on Deno got fired
how about the IP? will the future open source project be DENO or will they have to come up with another permutation.
(I've trademarked ENDO , feel free to DM me for a license)
One step towards a $25K github replacement?
Announcing eDon, my rewrite of Deno in Rust!
Edit: Yes, but it's not named after me, which this fork fixes.
It's going to be the first JavaScript runtime to natively support Super Intelligence APIs.
I'm having an LLM replacing all occurrences of "ai" in every API with "si", in the hopes that OpenSI or SpaceXSI will acquihire me.
Deno's already mostly Rust
https://blog.cloudflare.com/deno-joins-cloudflare/
> The Deno team is joining Cloudflare to radically simplify self-hosting Workers and Durable Objects so developers can use the same primitives in more places.
Well, that's pretty big news actually.
Cloudflare is playing a big game ...
Holy shit, I used to work on the Workers Runtime Team and I'm surprised!
Congrats Ry
can yall stop selling out to cloudflare? The continued consolidation of the internet/tech is wild.
Honestly, this motion right here is the death of open source - the rug pull. I no longer can trust any open source project won't get bought up and sunsetted. I'm glad open tofu and valkey and Linux exist to serve as a counter example but this makes me sad.
It's not the death of open source. It will probably be the death of small company open source. Either 100% community/non profit or 100% big corporation and users check corporate alignment with project goals.
Honestly with AI just build it yourself.
I took the plunge and ripped out all my (“open source”) Magento shopfronts and reimplemented them from the ground in…… 2 hours. And it is so much more performant to boot.
This. Internally as of about two months ago I use _zero_ open source code in any of my projects. Anything that I was still relying on was 100% rewritten with an LLM. The only hard dependency remaining is the Linux kernel itself which I predict I'll be able to replace in a few months. The current rewrite is functional except for networking and wider driver support.
RIP
So both major (and the only meaningful) possible Node alternatives have been absorbed into proprietary monoliths in the last year. We all know how well the Joyent years went, RIP to open source innovation at this point.
Node is still there
huhyyy
is this Cloudflare signalling they're going to hard pivot to being an AI company?
No if that were true they wouldn't be stopping development of Deno, which as it stands sits in the best position for codemode given it's granular sandboxing.
workerd has also had granular sandboxing all along... I actually coined the term "code mode" in this blog post:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/
Kind of hard to figure out what sandboxing controls are available given the lack of docs.
Given it's server focus though, I'd be very surprised if it was as good as Deno for giving agents a local code sandbox.
Docs: https://developers.cloudflare.com/dynamic-workers/
Also another blog post from when the feature became generally available: https://blog.cloudflare.com/dynamic-workers/
I agree it would be an awkward choice for an agent that runs as a local application, but the trend I think is towards agents running more and more on servers.
Servers, sure. Not necessarily your servers tho
workerd is open source, you can run it on your own servers.
hard pivot to ai confirmed.
I think it's well-known that we've been pretty focused on AI agent infrastructure for a while...
</3
> Deno sells out
I read it more as:
> Deno people probably just want a paycheck after they spent years seeking glory and money on something that other people used but didn't pay them a cent for.
My take: Opensource-Infrastructure-as-startup-but-also-charity is a thing that is going to die along with ZIRP. I don't know why VCs ever sniffed around things like this in the first place. The younger generation that followed this business model with liberal "take my stuff" licenses and sneered at GPL etc are learning the hard way that making a nice cool thing and getting noticed is not going to earn you a good living. (And other people will make millions off your passionate work.)
> We will support the Deno runtime for another year with monthly releases containing bug fixes and security updates. After that year we will end our development of the Deno runtime. Deno will remain open source, and we welcome others who want to continue its development.
So Deno is going to be unsupported and will no longer be maintained and will be discontinued.
It looks like "written in Rust" is not enough for a selling point and lost out to the fierce competition against Bun.
Isn't bun also written in rust, so can you clarify what your point is here?
Deno wasn't doing well and was repeatedly outperformed in downloads and raw performance when Bun was written in Zig, and even before Bun got acquired by Anthropic.
My point is, even if Bun stayed on Zig, Deno still struggled to compete regardless of the language used.
I'd guess Deno failed because of the original decision of not supporting node_modules, instead went with a different way of handling dependencies. Else the native typescript support would most likely had pushed them to bigger success past nodejs.
Though nodejs was even then quite solid in it's position, so maybe it would not have made a difference.
What a shame. Guess me and the clankers will be maintaining a fork now
uh oh
Sorry, but even factoring in that this acquisition carries over the existing customer base and goodwill, this is still **** (censored because I aim to stay polite). Deno is factually speaking a one to two week project at this point (proven by the numerous JS runtimes already on the market). I genuinely do not see how this makes any sense whatsoever. If Cloudflare was seeking to hire the team behind Deno they could have done it at a fraction of the price paid. This, naturally, assumes they did pay anything and I can't be bothered to look up the exact $$$ amounts.
I think Deno’s VC money ran out (see the layoffs a few months ago) and Cloudflare offered a stable, well paying job, maybe with stock options.
Just this morning I checked the Deno blog (again like so often in recent weeks) to see if they are still alive. The number of mentions in Hacker News posts and comments was zero in recent weeks. The project was basically dead or abandoned already. Sucks, because I went all-in on Deno.
It was pretty naive to stand in front of that NodeJS train.
Welp. All tech eventually gets bought out by military contractors or grows big enough to become one.
So Cloudflare killed Deno
Its no longer gonna be supported after 1 year
In that case Deno is not joining cloudflare, it's got eaten.
I invested a lot and use deno everywhere. Can't trust anything these days.
Lets fork it into opendeno. I like to have an all-in-one swiss army knife tool.
> So Cloudflare killed Deno
Uh no. The lack of users killed Deno.
Platforms like supabase or netlify use deno for serverless functions, so they should have been supporting it more.
Aren't Supabase or Netlify customers of Deno Deploy?
As a bystander, I'm excited by this. I don't know what it'll be, but I have a sense some interesting, powerful, and secure new ways of shipping code could come from this marriage...
Time and again, staying on the mainstream node/npm stack continues to be the validated choice. I've seen this happen with io.js, bun, and deno. The situation has been similar for yarn/bun and most alternatives on the package manager side.
Of course, that's not to say the work done on these platforms was wasted. The divide around io.js was meaningful to getting things moving faster and change the governance structure. Deno and bun both showcased things Node could be doing better and some of that was folded back in.
And in spite of all those past experiences, I still find myself using pnpm over npm today. I'm sure npm will continue to evolve and eventually the critical features of pnpm will just be part of core npm. But the gap today is massive enough that pnpm over npm feels critical. The disk usage and performance wins are life-changing for daily work and CI flows.